Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />4. ACTION: <br /> <br />Ratification of Unanimous Intergovernmental Relations Committee Actions and Discussion and Action on Non- <br />unanimous Intergovernmental Relations Committee Actions on Legislative Policy from February 11 and <br />February 18, 2009 <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to ratify the Intergovernmental Relations <br />Committee’s unanimous actions on bills and approval of staff recommendations in the February 11, <br />and February 18, 2009, Intergovernmental Relations Bill Reports for bills not pulled for discussion <br />at those Intergovernmental Relations Committee meetings. Roll call vote; the motion passed un- <br />animously, 7:0. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy directed the council’s attention to the bills that were not unanimous. <br /> <br />Senate Resolution 1 – Urges governor to withhold deployment of Oregon National Guard to Iraq or Afghanis- <br />tan. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to adopt a Support position on the Senate <br />Resolution 1. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling explained that he had voted in opposition to this resolution because of language that seemed to <br />make reference to the President not setting any plans into place to withdraw the Oregon troops from Afghanistan and <br />Iraq. He said the President had only been in office for a little more than a month and needed to be given a chance. <br />He felt that without an exit strategy to protect the troops that were there, the wrong message would be sent. He <br />averred that they needed to be shown support in addition to bringing them and all of the troops home safely. <br /> <br />Councilor Pryor appreciated the debate on the resolution. He felt that the staff recommendation was the wiser one <br />because, while many people did not make a distinction between the country’s action in Iraq and in Afghanistan, he <br />did. He said he might consider the military action in Iraq to be an “incredibly ill-considered and bad thing to do” but <br />he did not hold the same position about Afghanistan. He could not support “lumping” them together. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy ascertained from Intergovernmental Relations Manager, Brenda Wilson, that the language in the <br />resolution was language on which many communities were voting. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark echoed Councilor Poling’s concern. He stressed that he took this very seriously. He had lost a good <br />friend from college in Afghanistan in September. <br /> <br />Roll call vote; the motion failed, 4:3; councilors Ortiz, Taylor, and Zelenka voting in favor. <br /> <br />Senate Bill 227 – Increases the penalty for knowingly furnishing alcohol to persons under the age of 21 years <br />and imposes suspension of driving privileges or right to apply for driving privileges for 90 days in certain <br />instances. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka, seconded by Councilor Clark, moved to adopt a Priority 3 Support position on <br />Senate Bill 227. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor explained that she had moved to oppose the bill because she believed that the penalty was too <br />extreme. She could approve it if it applied to furnishing alcohol to people who were under the ages of 16 or 18, but <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council February 23, 2009 Page 9 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />