Laserfiche WebLink
Requires advisory committee to evaluate periodically minimum percentage set for <br />number of hours to be worked by apprentices on public works projects and to assist <br />Commissioner of Bureau of Labor and Industries in administration of Act. <br /> Requires specifications and contracts for public works for which contract price exceeds <br />$750,000 to state that contractors and subcontractors must be approved training agents <br />and that minimum percentage of total hours worked on public works project must be <br />performed by apprentices. <br /> Requires contractor or contractor's surety to provide certified statements concerning <br />employment of apprentices on public works projects. <br /> Provides for civil penalty of not more than $5,000 per violation of provision of Act plus <br />additional civil penalty in amount equal to $20 multiplied by number of hours required to <br />be worked, but not worked, by apprentices. <br /> Directs moneys collected from additional civil penalty into State Apprenticeship and <br />Training Education Fund and continuously appropriates moneys to State Apprenticeship <br />and Training Council for specified purposes. <br />Sponsored by: Representative HOLVEY; Representatives BARNHART, BUCKLEY, DEMBROW, <br />SHIELDS, WITT <br />URL:http://www.leg.state.or.us/09reg/measpdf/hb2800.dir/hb2838.intro.pdf <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Mike Penwell Mike Penwell CS-FAC 2/27/2009 Pri 3 No No Oppose <br />Comments: <br /> This bill would add onerous and unnecessary bureaucracy to public projects and make <br />public projects a de facto apprenticeship program that should rightfully be under the <br />purview of the building industry and the individual apprenticeship programs of each trade. <br />The combination of onerous tracking and reporting requirements and the requirements <br />for minimum percentages of apprentice workers on projects might actually result in higher <br />overall project costs and lower overall project quality. It should be up to each individual <br />contractor and subcontractor to determine the appropriate mix of apprentice level workers <br />and more highly skilled journeyman or other level workers for each project rather than <br />being mandated by the State (and by default cities and other public agencies) through a <br />complex and expensive oversight structure. <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Eric Jones Eric Jones PW-ADM 3/10/2009 <br />Comments: <br />Agree with other reviewers <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Paul Klope PWE 2/27/2009 Pri 3 Yes YesVIII. B Oppose <br />Comments: <br />The title of the bill describes it's content. This bill is similar to a bill introduced during the <br />last session. This bill would reduce competition for bids, because many contractors will <br />chose not to bid on these projects rather than develop and administer an apprenticeship <br />program. This effect of this bill would also be to reduce the number of subcontractors <br />available to work on projects for the same reason. This bill would increase City's cost of <br />administering projects in order to verify the contractor's and all of the subcontractor's <br />apprenticeship programs are in compliance. Contractors bid prices to the City will <br />increase as a result of this bill because of the cost of administering the program, finding <br />and hiring the apprentices and doing the training. This bill will cause an increase in the <br />contractors bid prices to the City because of they will need to add cost to cover the risk of <br />mistakes and inefficiencies of the apprentices. At some point, it may become difficult to <br />find apprentices, because of the ongoing nature of this program and the limited duration <br />of the apprenticeships. Also, there is no guarantee that the apprentices will work any <br />longer than the duration of the project that they were hired for, so people employed as <br />apprentices could end up unemployed in a short time. <br />ContactRespondentDept Updated Priority Policy Poli Numb Recommendation <br />Jenifer Willer Jenifer Willer PWE 3/4/2009 Pri 3 Yes YesVIII. B Oppose <br />Comments: <br />I agree with the comments made by Mike and Paul. <br />7 <br />