My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 03/09/09 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2009
>
CC Minutes - 03/09/09 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:27:17 AM
Creation date
5/13/2009 3:05:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
3/9/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Marlene Varady <br />, Crest Drive, Ward 2, Eugene, submitted a petition with 37 signatures requesting the <br />following: assess the entire ward affected by road improvements, allow assessments to be paid when <br />property is sold, make available an interest-free or very low interest loan from the City and provide some <br />type of tax advantage or lower property taxes on assessed homes to help defer the costs. She had talked to <br />many neighbors and one family was faced with foreclosure while other faced considerable financial <br />hardships. She said there was a range of incomes in the neighborhood. Declining property values and lack <br />of financing made it extremely difficult for people to sell homes. <br /> <br />Kim Heddinger <br />, Crest Drive, Ward 2, Eugene, stated that she owned two lots and would be assessed <br />$38,000, which was not affordable. She objected to Mr. Collins’ characterization of neighbors as a “triad” <br />and noted that the neighborhood was diverse. She said the roads had been in poor condition for many <br />decades and the improvements would not increase property values. She said it would be difficult to finance <br />the assessments in the current credit climate. She encouraged the City to research how other municipalities <br />handled street improvement assessments. <br /> <br />Marilyn Mohr <br />, River Road neighborhood, said her neighbors recognized the inequitability of the current <br />system of assessment for street improvements. She encouraged the council to find more equitable methods <br />for financing street improvements as it affected property owners across the city. <br /> <br />Jan Fillinger <br />, Crest Drive, Ward 2, Eugene, encouraged the council to modify the code to provide a fairer <br />assessment method for street improvements and supported a moratorium on street improvements if that was <br />necessary in order to establish a more equitable approach. He said many people, particularly the elderly, <br />had fixed, low or no income and needed other options for paying assessments, such as when property was <br />sold. He urged the council to delay the project and modify the code. <br /> <br />Joan Kelly <br />, Elmira Road, Eugene, commented that it was not that easy to obtain the necessary number of <br />property owners to oppose a project as it was not simply 50 percent plus one; it was based on the assessable <br />linear footage. She said a large number of rentals, and footage that was not directly in front of a residence, <br />further complicated the matter. She was supportive of options such as paying an assessment at the time a <br />property was sold. She was distressed that it appeared easier to assess residents for the cost of street <br />improvements than to deal with the federal regulations involved in using stimulus funds. She noted <br />inconsistencies in subsidy income information on different forms that had not yet been corrected. <br /> <br />Bill Eddie <br />, Crest Drive, Ward 2, Eugene, thanked the council for its thoughtful discussion of assessment <br />issues. He said it was a good time to find a more equitable solution to paying for street improvements by <br />sharing the financial burden among more users of the roads. He preferred postponing the project until next <br />summer while a better assessment policy was developed. He said the assessment would currently affect <br />about 120 tax lots; spreading it to Ward 2 would involve about 8,000 properties at an estimated $250 each. <br />He said assessing every lot in the City would cost each home owner about $40 and make each street belong <br />to all residents. He urged the council to change the code and make street assessments fair to all concerned. <br /> <br />Randy Prince <br />, Eugene, expressed disappointment over what he perceived as downgrading the police <br />auditor’s position by eliminating the requirement that the auditor be an attorney. He felt the council’s <br />discussion of supervision of the auditor sounded like micromanagement of a position that did not need any <br />more feedback than the City Manager. He said the auditor was supposed to be independent and many of the <br />issues that had currently been raised, such as concurrent investigations, would be much more difficult to <br />resolve if the auditor was not as qualified as an attorney. He advocated for Interim Police Auditor Dawn <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council March 9, 2009 Page 2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.