Laserfiche WebLink
Metadata
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
goal to protect waterways, but resulted in up to 548 people losing their property rights for value that was <br />shared by the entire community. He said it was wrong to put the cost of cleaning up waterways on a very <br />few people and he would not support the ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling asked what it would cost the City to acquire the property necessary to meet the proposal. <br />Ms. Walch said the cost estimate for a conservation easement approach was provided at the council’s <br />January 28, 2009, work session as an alternative to a regulatory approach. She said the ordinance was not a <br />proposal to acquire those management areas. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon agreed with Councilor Clark’s objections to the ordinance. <br /> <br />The motion passed, 5:3; councilors Clark, Poling and Solomon voting no. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 9 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Jon Ruiz <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Lynn Taylor) <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council March 9, 2009 Page 7 <br />