Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Ms. Leonard and Ms. Reza reviewed the four objectives/priorities in the work plan, as outlined in the <br />Agenda Item Summary (AIS) and attachment entitled Human Rights Commission FY10/11 Work Plan. <br /> <br />Ms. Reza discussed the outcomes of the first goal, which had to do with working to increase the Human <br />Rights Commission’s effectiveness, efficiency, and accountability in responding to and aiding in the <br />resolution of incidents of discrimination and harassment. She stated that the primary responsibility for <br />achieving the outcome would fall on the Advocates Response Team (ART) and the Human Right Support <br />System (HRSS), which would focus more on the management of the goal and working with volunteers. <br /> <br />Ms. Leonard related that the second goal, which sought to promote relationships between the community and <br />HRC through collaborative work on human rights issues, would be achieved by increasing the training and <br />education for commissioners and in community engagement and support. She said the commission hoped to <br />sponsor community summits so that community members could come and talk to elected officials and a <br />human rights summit to educate the community. She stated that HRC leadership, HRC staff, and the <br />Education and Outreach Committee would take primary responsibility for this goal. <br /> <br />Ms. Leonard stated that the third goal was focused on enhancing the relationships and communications with <br />the City of Eugene council, boards, commissions, and staff. She said the HRC ordinance contained <br />language regarding how the HRC might interact at policy levels and with department chairs. She noted that <br />the primary responsibility for the goal would fall to the leadership of the HRC, the HRC itself, and the <br />individual liaisons to the other commissions and the Civilian Review Board (CRB). <br /> <br />Ms. Reza said the fourth goal was around working toward the implementation of a Human Rights <br />Framework. She related that the HRC was getting a lot of feedback from other cities looking to Eugene as a <br />possible example of a human rights city. She said they hoped to present a recommendation to the City <br />Council in that regard, possibly in the form of a draft human rights ordinance to push forward the <br />framework of a human rights city. She stated that the goal would be worked on by the commissioners and <br />the community members that were interested in it. <br /> <br />Ms. Leonard indicated that she would send the councilors an email with all of the acknowledgements she <br />wanted to share with them. She related that the Accessibility Committee had been working on taxi <br />accessibility, the City’s Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) transportation plan, the bicycle and <br />pedestrian plan, curb cuts, accessible signals and intersections, and things along that line. <br /> <br />Ms. Leonard said the HRC wanted to have a clearer plan for how incidents of hate, such as hate graffiti, <br />would be handled. She underscored the importance of responding in a way that engaged the community and <br />showed the community’s ability to provide support rapidly. <br /> <br />Ms. Leonard thanked the councilors, and especially Mr. Clark for serving as the council liaison to the HRC. <br />She welcomed Mr. Brown as the new council liaison to the HRC. <br /> <br />Ms. Reza reiterated the desire of the HRC to figure out ways to better collaborate with the council in <br />addition to finding better ways to provide support and advice to the council on issues related to human <br />rights. She asked for council input about ways the HRC could provide this type of support. She also asked <br />how best the HRC could use its liaison to further communication between the council and HRC. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council March 11, 2009 Page 6 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />