Laserfiche WebLink
Police Complaint System and Civilian Oversight Recommendations <br />I. Executive Summary <br />Over the past year, the Eugene Police Commission has conducted an extensive review of current practices <br />for handlingcomplaints against police, including a re-examination of different models of civilian <br />oversight. Background research for this project included a significant literature review and a consultant <br />report on civilian oversight modelsin operation nationally. Multiple communityforumswereheld to <br />seek public input on concerns with the current police complaint system and to compilesuggestions for <br />improvements. Committees were formed to develop specific recommendations for how complaints are <br />received, classified, investigated and, once a conclusion is developed, reviewed. The committees <br />submitted a conceptual oversight model to the Police Commission that instills more robust civilian review <br />into the complaint process. The conceptual model was revised following additional commission <br />th <br />discussion and communityinput. On July 25, the resulting recommendations will be presented to City <br />Council for its consideration. The commission hopes that following the Council work session, it will <br />continue to refine the oversight model and assist with the development of the ordinance and policies that <br />will support implementation of the new complaint system. <br />Values/Outcomes Sought in New Complaint System <br />Creation of an accessible, safe, impartial and responsive complaintintake system <br />o <br />Assurance of high quality,thorough and unbiased investigations <br />o <br />Accountability and fairness for all involved <br />o <br />Increased transparency in how complaints are handled and dispositions are generated to build <br />o <br />credibility and trust in thecomplaint system <br />Identify organizational improvements to enhance the qualityof police services to the public <br />o <br />Avoid pitfalls encountered in other communitieswhen implementing civilian review <br />o <br />How Proposal is Different than Current System <br />Communitymember complaints are lodged with independent auditor’s office <br />o <br />Investigations are removed from police supervisors and transferred to an expanded investigative <br />o <br />unit within IA <br />Full time auditor, independent from the police department,monitors on-going IA investigations <br />o <br />for quality assurance <br />Citizen review board oversees the work of the auditor to ensure that investigations are fair <br />o <br />Options for alternative resolution to complaints are expanded and utilized morefrequently <br />o <br />Proposed Oversight System Authority (Hybrid Model of Auditor and Civilian Review Board) <br />Auditor’s office receives complaints, conductspreliminaryinvestigations and classifies how <br />o <br />cases will be handled <br />Auditor actively monitors internal investigations, including abilityto participate in interviews, <br />o <br />require additional investigation, contract with outsideentity to conduct certain investigations and <br />recommend case dispositions to the Chief of Police <br />Auditor seeks improvements to police services by identifyingpolicyand training issues <br />o <br />associated with complaints and reviewing tort and risk claims <br />Auditor identifies cases for review board to oversee and provides quarterly reports to board on <br />o <br />complaint processing decisions, investigative findings and case outcomes <br />Civilian board reviews and comments on investigations sent to it by the auditor,upon request of <br />o <br />the complainant, or at its discretion, and in specific situations, can require the case to be re- <br />opened for further investigation <br />Board monitors the work of the auditor’soffice to ensure that complaint handlingdecisions and <br />o <br />recommendations to the Chief on case investigations reflect community values <br />1 <br /> <br />