Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />1.Expand the adjustment review process to include interior lot setbacks, minimum landscape <br />standards, fence type, height and location, and drive-thru service area setback and landscaping; <br /> <br />2.Provide comprehensive adjustment review criteria to be used within the Downtown Plan area; <br /> <br />3.Remove the applicability of certain regulations that apply to downtown development but were <br />written for areas outside downtown; and <br /> <br />4.Amend regulations in the S-F Fifth Avenue Special Area Zone to be consistent with the rest of <br />the adjacent commercially-zoned downtown area. <br /> <br />In addition to the proposed code amendments, the Planning Commission discussed the S-F Fifth <br />Avenue Special Area Zone and concluded that a separate zone in this area was unnecessary, given <br />other existing code regulations downtown. The Planning Commission recommended initiation of a <br />code amendment to consider removal of the S-F zone from the land use code in its entirety. This <br />item will be incorporated into a future phase of the Downtown Code Amendment project. <br /> <br />Land Use Application Noticing Requirements: <br />Currently, the code requires that the City bear sole responsibility for mailing and posting public <br />notices. The proposed amendments to land use application noticing requirements would enable the <br />City to consider shifting that responsibility to applicants, rather than it being the City’s sole <br />responsibility. <br /> <br />The proposed changes are in alignment with citywide goals to increase cost recovery and reduce the <br />impact on the general fund. It is expected that that this shift in responsibilities would reduce <br />general fund subsidy of public notice and mailing costs related to land use applications, increase <br />administrative efficiency and reduce associated staff time currently devoted to these tasks. The <br />proposed code amendments would not result in any formal change of noticing responsibilities or <br />public outreach. Rather, the changes would simply enable the City to consider implementing this <br />concept among many other budgeting strategies to address anticipated budget challenges going into <br />the next fiscal year. <br /> <br />If the City elects to implement procedural changes to noticing requirements at a future date, the <br />process would involve ample opportunity for public input as part of outreach efforts and the formal <br />public process for development of new administrative rules. <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />Findings addressing consistency with related City policies, including provisions of the Metro Plan <br /> <br />and Downtown Plan, are included as an exhibit to the draft ordinance (Exhibit A of Attachment A). <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br /> <br />Following the close of the public hearing,the City Council may consider the following options: <br />1. Approve the proposed ordinance. <br />2. Approve the proposed ordinance with specific modifications as determined by the City Council. <br />3. Deny the proposed ordinance. <br /> <br /> <br /> Z:\CMO\2009 Council Agendas\M090518\S0905181.doc <br />