Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Staff Recommendation: Priority 2 Support <br />IGR Committee Vote: Priority 2 Oppose (Councilor Taylor – no second) <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor thought the City should oppose the bill because she felt such a fund would encourage the <br />expansion of urban growth boundaries. Although the original version of this bill came to the full City <br />Council and the council adopted a position of support on the bill, the bill has been modified to provide <br />that if the entire bond amount as directed in the bill cannot be deposited into the Fund, other lottery funds <br />can be used to deposit into the Fund. <br /> <br />HB 2699A: <br /> This bill would modify the definition of “public works;” classify exemption from ad <br />valorem property taxation as funds of a public agency for the purpose of imposing prevailing rate of <br />wage; require City, county or other sponsors of enterprise zones to notify the Commissioner of the <br />Bureau of Labor and Industries of any exemption from ad valorem property taxation connected with <br />public works located in the sponsor's enterprise zone; require sponsors of the enterprise zone in which a <br />public works is located to pay a specified fee; and create procedures by which multiple public agencies <br />that award contracts for public works or multiple sponsors that designate enterprise zones in which a <br />public works is located must apportion fees and receive certified statements. <br /> <br />Staff Recommendation: Priority 2 Oppose <br />IGR Committee Vote: Priority 2 Support (Councilor Taylor - no second) <br /> <br /> <br />RELATED CITY POLICIES <br />Ratification of IGR Committee actions is the making or affirming of the City of Eugene’s policy with <br />respect to federal and state legislative issues or such other matters as may come to the council from the <br />committee. <br /> <br /> <br />COUNCIL OPTIONS <br /> <br />The council may ratify or decline to ratify the IGR Committee’s unanimous actions and approval of staff <br />recommendations. Actions on which the IGR committee is not unanimous must be addressed by the full <br />council in order to provide direction to staff in Salem. <br /> <br /> <br />CITY MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATION <br /> <br />The City Manager recommends ratification of the IGR Committee's actions and that there be a discussion <br />on the actions that were not unanimous. <br /> <br /> <br />SUGGESTED MOTION <br /> <br />Move to ratify the IGR Committee's unanimous actions on bills and approval of staff recommendations <br />in the May 27, 2009, IGR Bill Reports for bills not pulled for discussion at those IGR meetings. <br /> <br />There also need to be motions to state positions for each bill listed above where the IGR Committee action <br />was not unanimous. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Z:\CMO\2009 Council Agendas\M090608\S0906083.doc <br /> <br /> <br />