Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />Previous Council Action and History <br />Eugene lacks adequate funding to maintain current service levels for street operations and maintenance <br />(O&M) activities in FY10. These are the critical street and traffic infrastructure services which keep the <br />streetlights lit, the street signs and signals in good working order, the potholes and cracks patched, the <br />alternative modes goals on track, and more. These services are paid from the City’s Road Operations <br />Fund, which has experienced a 15% decrease in revenue over the last five years while expenditures have <br />increased by 23% in that period, despite an organizational restructuring in FY04 and FY05 which resulted <br />in service reductions, efficiencies and over $1.0 million in annual budget savings. <br /> <br />The critical nature of the shortfall in funding for Road Fund operations and maintenance became evident <br />last fall, when projections showed that with no new revenues the Road Fund was expected to generate a <br />$2.6 million annual operating deficit in the current fiscal year (FY09), and that without deliberate action, <br />the fund would deplete all available fund resources and become insolvent sometime in late 2009. In <br />response to this projection, the City Manager presented several options to the City Council in a work <br />session on November 12, 2008. At that meeting, councilors acknowledged that the Road Fund funding <br />shortfalls could not be found in service reductions alone, and that the need to find new sources of City <br />revenue for transportation systems was great. <br /> <br />On February 8, 2009, the council discussed the need for two different sets of funding strategies: a one- <br />time, “stop gap” plan for fully funding critical Road Fund services in FY10, and a comprehensive “road <br />map” for solving the City’s overall transportation funding problems in the long term. At that meeting, <br />interest was expressed in a garbage hauler surcharge, but at a level lower than the proposed 10%. The <br />council acknowledged that developing the longer-term solutions, including a potential street utility fee <br />and a potential street lighting fee, would need to involve more public input and buy-in over the coming <br />months. <br /> <br />On April 8, 2009, the council discussed the City Manager’s proposed one-time funding strategy to <br />maintain street O&M services through fiscal year 2010. This strategy included a new 5% transportation <br />surcharge on solid waste hauler collection revenue and amendments to the Eugene City Code to expand <br />the allowed uses of stormwater and wastewater user fees for road-related purposes to allow a one-time <br />transfer of $500,000 from existing City stormwater and wastewater fund reserves to the Road Fund for <br />FY10. On April 20, the council held public hearings on the two proposals. Eleven speakers testified on <br />the proposed solid waste surcharge and one speaker spoke regarding the use of stormwater and <br />wastewater funds. Through this community input and subsequent council and Budget Committee <br />discussions, a number of questions and concerns were raised regarding the proposed solid waste hauler <br />surcharge. Attachment A represents the City staff response to those questions and concerns. <br /> <br />On April 27, the council unanimously approved the ordinance changes allowing the use of stormwater and <br />wastewater funds for Road Fund purposes and authorizing a one-time transfer of $500,000 from the <br />utilities to the Road Fund. At the same time, the council voted 5-3 not to adopt the proposed solid waste <br />surcharge ordinance. As indicated above, the council asked the Budget Committee to provide <br />recommendations to the council and City Manager on whether to enact a solid waste hauler surcharge to <br />balance the Road Fund budget in FY10. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> Z:\CMO\2009 Council Agendas\M090610\S090610B.doc <br /> <br /> <br />