My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A: PAORC Recommendations
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 06/22/09 Work Session
>
Item A: PAORC Recommendations
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:04:23 PM
Creation date
6/19/2009 10:46:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/22/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />2.454(5) Except as provided in this subsection (5), the auditor Want to Except as provided in this subsection (5), the Except as provided in this subsection (5), the auditor <br />shall treat an allegation against the police chief the Discuss auditor shall treat an allegation against the police shall treat an allegation against the police chief the <br />same as a complaint against a police employee. For More chief the same as a complaint against a police same as a complaint against a police employee. For <br />purposes of this subsection, an “allegation” is a report employee. For purposes of this subsection, an purposes of this subsection, an “allegation” is a report or <br />or claim that the police chief has committed a crime, “allegation” is a report or claim that the police chief claim that the police chief has committed a crime, <br />violated any provision of EC 2.240 to 2.246 or 2.450 to has committed a crime, violated any provision of violated any provision of EC 2.240 to 2.246 or 2.450 to <br />2.456, violated a person’s civil rights, or failed to EC 2.240 to 2.246 or 2.450 to 2.456, violated a 2.456, violated a person’s civil rights, or failed to <br />perform the police chief’s duties in accordance with person’s civil rights, or failed to perform the police perform the police chief’s duties in accordance with <br />applicable professional law enforcement standards, chief’s duties in accordance with applicable applicable professional law enforcement standards, <br />including those duties normally associated with sworn professional law enforcement standards, including including those duties normally associated with <br />officers. those duties normally associated with sworn applicable to sworn officers. <br />officers. <br />(a) If the auditor receives an allegation against the If the auditor receives an allegation against the police chief, <br />police chief, the auditor shall notify the city manager If the auditor receives an allegation against the police the auditor shall forward a copy of the allegation to the city <br />and shall classify the allegation and determine chief, the auditor shall forward a copy of the allegation manager. The city manager shall notify the council, and <br />whether further investigation is necessary in order to to the city manager. The city manager shall notify the investigate the allegation. The manager shall keep the auditor <br />ascertain material facts concerning the allegation. council, and investigate the allegation. The manager informed of the progress of the investigation. Upon <br />shall keep the auditor informed of the progress of the completion of the investigation, but prior to the finalization of <br />(b) If the auditor determines that further <br />investigation. Upon completion of the investigation, but the investigation report, the city manager shall provide the <br />investigation is necessary, the auditor shall refer the <br />prior to the finalization of the investigation report, the auditor with a draft of the report. The auditor shall review the <br />allegation to the city manager, who shall conduct or <br />city manager shall provide the auditor with a draft of the draft report and provide comments about the draft to the <br />arrange for an investigation in a timely fashion on <br />report. The auditor shall review the draft report and manager within 7 days of receiving the draft. The manager <br />terms that allow the auditor to actively monitor the <br />provide comments about the draft to the manager within shall consider any comments received from the auditor and <br />investigation to the same extent as provided in EC <br />7 days of receiving the draft. The manager shall finalize the report within 7 days. Once the city manager <br />2.456 (2)(d) and (e) for investigations of other <br />consider any comments received from the auditor and issues a decision on the allegation, the manager shall inform <br />complaints. <br />finalize the report within 7 days. Once the city manager the council of the manager’s decision related to the allegation. <br />issues a decision on the allegation, the manager shall <br />(c) The city manager shall inform the auditor of the <br />inform the council of the manager’s decision related to <br />city manager’s decision on the allegation and provide <br /> <br />the allegation. <br />a written rationale for the decision in a timely fashion. <br /> <br />If the city receives a claim for damages that alleges <br />2.456(1)(c) Auditor to review OK <br />that a police employee caused the damage, a copy of <br />risk management <br />the claim shall be forwarded to the auditor’s office for <br />claims <br />a determination as to whether the claim should also <br />be classified and processed as a complaint. <br />The auditor’s office conducts the preliminary The auditor has exclusive authority to classify and The auditor has exclusive authority to classify, and route <br />2.456(1)(d) Auditor’s authority Want to <br />investigation of all complaints lodged with the auditor’s route complaints as well as to reclassify complaints complaints as well as to and reclassify complaints. if, <br />to classify and route Discuss <br />office or internal affairs to appropriately classify and if, upon further investigation and receipt of The auditor may reclassify a complaint if upon further <br />complaints More <br />route the complaint and any accompanying additional information that was not available at the investigation and receipt of additional information that <br />information accordingly. The auditor has exclusive time of intake, but before the completion of the was not available at the time of intake, but before the <br />authority to classify and route complaints as well as to investigation, the Auditor finds reclassification is completion of the investigation, the Auditor finds <br />reclassify complaints if, upon further investigation and warranted. reclassification is warranted. <br />receipt of additional information that was not available <br /> <br />at the time of intake, the Auditor finds reclassification <br />is warranted. <br /> <br /> - 2 - <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.