Item A: PAORC Recommendations - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

upon classification or as soon as possible after classification. (b) Paragraph (a) of this subsection shall not preclude preliminary investigations by the auditor’s office, or a police supervisor’s attempt to address a service complaint, provided that the supervisor prepares and forwards to the auditor within 24 hours a report identifying the complainant and contact information for the complainant, and explaining the nature of the service complaint and the outcome of the supervisor’s conversation with the complainant. (c) After consultation with the chief of police and the appropriate prosecutor, the auditor is authorized to require an administrative investigation to proceed concurrently with a related criminal investigation and prosecution. (d) The police auditor shall actively monitor internal investigations to ensure a thorough, objective, and timely investigation, and is authorized to: 1. Participate in complainant, employee and witness interviews; 2. Require the city to undertake additional investigation. (eb) The police auditor may require, and is authorized to contract for, an external investigation when the police auditor determines that an external investigation is appropriate. (fc) The police auditor will not be directly involved in any criminal investigations, but shall be kept apprised of the status of such investigations involving police employees. The police auditor shall have access to the case file relevant to the administrative portion of such investigations. [Following the conclusion of any criminal investigation or within 60 days after the date of the incident, the auditor has the authority to initiate an internal investigation unless the police auditor receives written notice from the District Attorney, United States Attorney, or City Prosecutor that the internal investigation would jeopardize the criminal investigation and prosecution.] (gd) All case files shall be provided to the police auditor upon conclusion of the investigation for review and a determination that the investigation was thorough and complete. Once the investigation is deemed complete, the involved employee’s immediate supervisor will confer with the police auditor and develop a case adjudication recommendation that will be forwarded through the chain of command to the chief of police for final adjudication. If the police auditor disagrees with the supervisor’s recommendation, his/her disagreements and comments will be documented and forwarded to the chief of police as well. The immediate supervisor and police auditor will use their best efforts to complete this process in a timely manner and without unreasonably delaying the final adjudication of the case. Ordinance - Page 6 of 8