Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Wilson, responding to a question from Ms. Ortiz, noted that a revenue impact statement had been <br />requested by State legislators in the most recent hearings regarding HB 3485 and maintained that unless <br />such information was made available the bill was unlikely to pass in its current form. Mr. Nelson further <br />noted that the tax credits provided in HB 3485 would be offered in perpetuity although the tax credits <br />would only be available to businesses for five years after their initial investments in the applicable <br />equipment or materials. <br />Ms. Wilson noted that there was a bill currently in the legislature and was very likely to pass that would <br />require the State to review all available tax credits to ensure that they were functioning as they were <br />originally intended to. <br />Ms. Taylor moved to adopt an oppose position on HB 3485. The motion died <br />for lack of a second. <br />Ms. Ortiz confirmed that HB 3485 would be forwarded to the Eugene City Council for further review and <br />discussion. <br />SB 621 - Relating to Oregon Production Investment Fund; amending ORS 284.368 and <br />315.514; and prescribing an effective date. <br />Ms. Wilson provided a brief description of SB 621 to the committee members and noted that staff was <br />currently recommending a Priority 3 support position regarding the bill. <br />Ms. Wilson noted that the current $5 million tax credit for film production in the State of Oregon had been <br />exhausted within six months of its inception. She further noted that SB 621 had been initiated at the <br />request of Governor Kulongoski to help support Oregon's growing film production industry and would <br />increase the current total tax credit to $7.5 million. <br />Ms. Wilson, responding to a question from Ms. Taylor, commented that it was unknown whether or not <br />film productions companies might find the State of Oregon, and the City of Eugene in particular, attractive <br />enough on its own to the point where the tax credits would be unnecessary. <br />Ms. Ortiz, seconded by Mr. Poling, moved to adopt a Priority 3 Support posi- <br />tion regarding SB 621. <br />Ms. Wilson, responding to a question from Ms. Ortiz, explained that the tax credits would be applicable to <br />actual Oregon expenses over $750,000.00 that a production company incurred on a film or television series <br />shot within the State <br />Ms. Wilson, responding to a question from Ms. Taylor, noted that Governor Kulongoski apparently <br />believed that the tax credits provided in SB 621 would encourage increased film production in the State. <br />Ms. Piercy, responding to comments from Ms. Taylor, maintained that tax credits such as those provided <br />in SB 621 were designed to encourage businesses and generate revenue for the State and were not <br />necessarily a needless tax giveaway. <br />Ms. Taylor felt that film production companies might be willing to come to Oregon without the tax credits <br />provided under SB 621. <br />Ms. Wilson, responding to a question from Mr. Poling, confirmed that SB 621 would increase the total tax <br />credit from $5 million to $7.5 million and would also provide partial reimbursement for salaries and <br />expenses for State residents hired by out of state film production companies to work on local projects. <br />MINUTES—Council Committee on Intergovernmental Relations May 20, 2009 Page 2 <br /> <br />