Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Clark suggested modifying the motion to replace “…check in with council officers before she makes <br />substantive decisions…” with “have regular check-in with council officers on day-to-day operations.” <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka restated his motion: “I move to reinstate the Police Auditor with the caveat that the council <br />recognizes she exercised poor judgment in getting into this circumstance; that she does not permit access to IA <br />PRO data to anyone outside the police auditor’s office without checking with the City Attorney; that she check- <br />in with council officers before she makes substantive decisions and meet regularly with council officers on day- <br />to-day management of the police auditor office; meet with the council officers, the City Attorney and the Deputy <br />Police Auditor to discuss legal issues about moving forward and meet with the Deputy Police Auditor and a <br />mediator on how to work together until the council hires a new police auditor.” <br /> <br />Mr. Brown wanted to see half of the provisions eliminated because he felt they were insulting to the experience <br />and intelligence of the council’s employee. He did not like the language but would support the motion because <br />he wanted the auditor to return to work. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor said she felt she was being forced to vote for something that was an insult to the person in question. <br />She asked if the provisions would apply to another person who was the police auditor. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka said the provisions applied to Ms. Reynolds, but many of them would likely be in the new <br />supervisory procedures. <br /> <br />The motion passed unanimously, 8:0. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 7:27 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Jon Ruiz <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Lynn Taylor) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 13, 2009 Page 9 <br /> Work Session <br />