Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Clark questioned whether the CRB sometimes had concerns about policies because it lacked information <br />about the background or intent of those policies. Ms. Reynolds said other jurisdictions had adjudication <br />categories of “within policy, but the policy was flawed” and “training failure.” She said Eugene’s system <br />did not have those outcomes, which could address some of the issues encountered by the CRB. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy asked if there was a process for determining whether training needs identified by the CRB or <br />auditor were addressed. She had spoken to the City Manager, who indicated that the auditor could also <br />contact him with respect to outstanding issues. Ms. Reynolds said it would be helpful to have information <br />from the Police Department about what training was being provided and to whom. <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy summarized that there appeared to be no significant disagreement among councilors regarding <br />the CRB and the Police Auditor. She heard general agreement on the need for a bulleted list of expectations, <br />a suggestion that many concerns could be addressed through better and more frequent communications with <br />the council and consensus that there should be a certain level of independence for the auditor and trust was <br />important in that relationship. <br /> <br />The meeting adjourned at 6:45 p.m. <br /> <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Jon Ruiz <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Lynn Taylor) <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council May 18, 2009 Page 4 <br /> Work Session <br />