My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item C: Eugene Comprehensive Lands Assessment
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 07/22/09 Work Session
>
Item C: Eugene Comprehensive Lands Assessment
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 1:18:49 PM
Creation date
7/17/2009 11:16:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
7/22/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ECLA: Baseline Assumptions ECONorthwest July 2009 Page 6 <br />The bottom lines of Table 2 illustrate an obvious point: if one assumes that there will <br />be a lot less employment growth, then a lot less land will be needed. We are not ready <br />to make a firm statement about whether Eugene has enough land to accommodate <br />expected employment growth because we are still refining the buildable lands <br />inventory. But combining the acreage requirements at the bottom of Table 2 with the <br />draft results of the BLI shows a net deficit of buildable land for commercial land and a <br />surplus for industrial land (but special site needs are considered, which could <br />before <br />lead to a conclusion that the existing UGB lacks sites of a size and location suitable for <br />certain types of employment growth). <br />Those conclusions are only as good as the assumptions they are based on. The origin <br />and assessment of the baseline assumptions in the employment land need estimate in <br />Table 2 are described below. <br />Employment growth <br />Employment growth is the amount of growth in jobs reasonably expected in Eugene <br />over the 2010 to 2030 period. We exclude government employment growth because <br />government land need is accommodated through public and semi-public land needs, <br />evaluated separately. Changes in the forecast of employment growth directly result in <br />changes in need for employment land. <br />There is no single “right” way to forecast employment growth. There are, however, <br />two methods for forecasting employment growth that, independent of their technical <br />merits, are legally sanctioned as “safe harbors”: (1) assume that employment will grow <br />2 <br />at the same rate as population (OAR 660-024-0040(8)((a)(ii)), or (2) assume that <br />employment will grow at the same rate as the Employment Department’s forecast for <br />Lane County. <br />? <br />Potential range of assumption: Assuming that employment will grow at the <br /> <br />same rate as population (a 0.9% annual growth) results in addition of about <br />20,000 jobs. Assuming that employment in Eugene will grow at the same rate <br />3 <br />as the one used in the Employment Department’s forecast for Lane County (a <br />1.4% annual growth rate) results in the addition of about 34,500 jobs, not <br />including government jobs, which are accounted for in public and semi-public <br />land needs. <br />? <br />CAC and TAC discussion: Several CAC and TAC members said the <br /> <br />assumption that Eugene’s employment will grow at the rate forecasted for <br /> <br /> <br /> Assumptions that serve as amulets that can be raised against the gale of future legal challenges to protect a <br />2 <br />jurisdiction from being blown out of the water. <br /> This assumption is based on the population forecast for the Eugene UGB presented in the “Lane County Rural <br />3 <br />Comprehensive Plan General Plan Policies 1984”, updated June 2009. Population in the Eugene UGB is forecast to <br />grow at about 0.88% annually. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.