Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Majeska Seese-Green <br />, PO Box 1214, Ward 7, reported that the Whiteaker Community Council had held its <br />annual meeting and elections. She related that 15 people had been elected to the board. She felt that the <br />turnout had been good. She added that the new chair was Kari Johnson, and noted that she would no longer <br />serve on the board. She supported the proposed skate park. She looked forward to having it near her home. <br />She also urged the council to support the “Idaho stop” bill. Additionally, she had been pleased that the <br />council had reinstated the acting Police Auditor, and that this had been done in an open session. Regarding <br />the railroad pesticide spraying, she wanted to register her agreement with everything Ms. Chirillo stated. <br />She wanted the City to ensure that the railroad had done everything it could to get notification in place prior <br />to future spraying. She said the position of the neighborhood council was that the City should urge Union <br />Pacific to utilize non-toxic modes of weed control. She stated that she would send the council an email <br />regarding the rest of her testimony. <br /> <br />Michael Quillin <br />, 2735 Kismet Way, Ward 8, wished to express his support for the office of the Police <br />Auditor. He was pleased that the council restored the acting Police Auditor to her position. He opined that <br />it seemed the only City office that appeared to receive adequate oversight was the auditor’s office and he <br />found this concerning. He believed that the council was quick to fault Ms. Reynolds for the breach of the <br />Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) she had signed with the Police Chief and that each delay of the <br />institution of police oversight was a violation of the City charter. He expressed amazement that the council <br />had “been quick” to place Ms. Reynolds on administrative leave when, he asserted, police officers accused <br />of using “unlawful deadly force remain on active duty.” He added his support for construction of a world- <br />class skate park in Eugene. <br /> <br />Dawn Marlan <br />, 920 Crest Drive, remarked that despite the fact that she lived on Crest Drive, she was “not <br />rich.” She related that she and her husband lived on one academic salary with no way of increasing their <br />income. She said when they bought their house they were informed that the most the street assessment could <br />cost them would be $10,000 and that this would be unlikely. She stated that at presently the assessment <br />was $20,000. She and her husband would not have bought their house had they known in advance how <br />much they would be assessed, should the street project happen. She said they had other debts and two <br />children who were their priorities over “shouldering a disproportionate amount of the burden for creating a <br />perfect street in the middle of a recession.” <br /> <br />Sue Kelly <br />, 3260 Storey Boulevard, said she had lived in Eugene for 30 years and had rented all of her life. <br />She stated that she was a letter carrier who had delivered mail on routes “all over Eugene and Springfield.” <br />She loved Eugene; for her it was an organism that was growing. She thought it had outgrown its current <br />form, including the way the street repairs were assessed. She did not think Eugene was a conglomerate of <br />different neighborhoods; it was a city in which everyone should pay for its streets. She felt that the current <br />street assessment methodology was divisive and painful. She also wanted to mention the skate park in order <br />to add her voice to those in support. She averred that it would create an opportunity akin to a “jewel in our <br />crown.” She opined that Eugene was the greatest city for the arts and outdoors and skating was an art that <br />was outdoors. She also agreed with the bicyclists in support of the “Idaho stop” law. <br /> <br />Moshe Immerman <br />, 2595½ McLean Boulevard, hoped everyone was taking time to enjoy the wildflowers of <br />spring. He thanked the council for reinstating the acting Police Auditor. He had engaged in lengthy <br />meetings with her and felt that she was “among the most competent, pristine, high-integrity public officials” <br />he had encountered in Oregon. He asserted that he was an “incident commander in the national park service <br />of inter-agency federal law enforcement teams… protecting sacred sites of Native Americans, keeping <br />paramilitary groups out of national parks.” He averred that her standard of integrity met his. He empha- <br />sized his support for Ms. Reynolds and that he believed that she had a lapse and this was because she was <br />human. He supported strong police oversight and asked that the council consider Ms. Reynolds as a leading <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 13, 2009 Page 8 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />