Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />However, the City still lacks adequate funding for major street repair projects, and the backlog of needed <br />street repairs has grown to over $170 million. While the five-year street repair bond approved by Eugene <br />voters last fall will fund 32 projects that will repair an estimated 70 lane miles of streets and three miles <br />of off-street bike and pedestrian paths, the City still has not resolved its long-term street repair funding <br />problem. Continuation of the City motor vehicle fuel tax at the five-cent level is a key component in a <br />package strategy endorsed by the council to ensure a stable, locally-controlled revenue stream to allow <br />the City to continue to make progress on that $170 million backlog of needed street repairs. <br /> <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />Previous Council Action and History <br />The City’s first motor vehicle fuel tax was enacted in January 2003, based on the recommendation from <br />the Citizen’s Subcommittee on Transportation System Funding. The subcommittee’s recommendation <br />was for a combination local motor vehicle fuel tax and transportation system maintenance fee for the <br />purpose of generating an additional $9.0 million annually to address the City’s critical transportation <br />system funding needs. That first fuel tax was implemented at three cents per gallon, and that portion has <br />generated an average of $2.0 million per year since 2003. The other revenue mechanism in that funding <br />recommendation, a street utility fee designed to generate an additional $6.5-$7.0 million per year, was <br />adopted but later repealed before it could be fully implemented. <br /> <br />A two-cent increase to the motor vehicle fuel tax was approved in January 2005, along with a sunset <br />provision that would cause the tax to revert to three cents per gallon on February 29, 2008. On January <br />28, 2008, the council voted to extend the sunset provision for three additional years to February 28, <br />2011, in order to allow sufficient time to see what new funding might result from the state legislation <br />and also to allow for the development and implementation of other elements of the council’s locally- <br />controlled package funding strategy. One element of that strategy, a three-cent increase to the local gas <br />tax, was not approved by the voters at the polls in November 2007. Additionally, the council declined <br />last month to approve a garbage-hauler surcharge which would have generated $900,000 per year for <br />street operations and maintenance services. As a result of the defeat of these efforts for additional street <br />funding, it is now more important than ever that the City retain the ability to control the level of its five- <br />cent local gas tax, now and into the future. <br /> <br />Funding Needs, Legal Analyses and Implementation Issues <br />Retaining the two-cent portion of the local motor vehicle fuel tax rate would provide continuation of <br />over $1.2 million in annual revenue currently received by the City. Together with the proceeds from the <br />five-year street repair bond and one-time federal stimulus monies for pavement preservation projects, <br />continuation of this local funding source should provide funding through the life of the street repair bond <br />sufficient to at least begin to reduce the rapid rate of growth and stabilize the $170 million backlog of <br />unfunded capital street repairs. <br /> <br />Road Operations and Maintenance Needs - The City’s Road Fund accounts for the operation and <br />maintenance services for Eugene’s street system. Last year, the City received over $6.5 million in State <br />Highway Trust Fund monies to fund these critical street services. If the new state legislation were to <br />provide another $2.0-$3.0 million to the City upon full implementation of the bill, together with revenue <br />from a small right-of-way fee on City utilities, it is possible that Eugene could stabilize funding for its <br />street operations services for the first time in many years. <br /> Z:\CMO\2009 Council Agendas\M090727\S0907274.DOC <br /> <br />