Laserfiche WebLink
Sources of i:unds <br />General Obligation Bonds: The City could ask cost for downtown City office l'acilities. The <br />voters to approve a property tax levy to repay annual charge is deposited into the City's Facility <br />general obligation bonds. Under Measure 50, a Reseiwe. <br />bond measure would be subject to double-majority <br />requirements, which includes an exception if the Net Freed-L~ Lease Payments: If sections of <br />bond election is held at a November general elec- Public Works that are located in private lease <br />fion in an even numbered yeah GO Bond proceeds space are moved into City-owned space, the <br />cannot be used for furnishings and equipment, annual amount that is paid in lease payments (net <br /> of the operations and maintenance costs on the <br />Other [lorrowit[g ]kIethodg: If the City had a new space) could be re-directed towards debt ser- <br />dedicated revenue stream to put towards this vice payments on bonds issued for the new space. <br />project, other borrowing methods could be used. <br />Attachment C includes a summary of the alternate Rate Increases for Services Housed in City <br />borrowing methods that might be available for a Hall: Those services that are rate-based, such as <br />large construction project, stormwater, wastewater, and so on, could increase <br /> their rates to contribute fnnds towards annual debt <br />Capital Lev3,: The City could ask voters to service payments on bonds issued to construct a <br />approve a capital levy of up to 10 years to pay for iproportionate area in the new City Hall. <br />the costs of capital construction. The levy would <br />exacerbate Measure 5 compression in the General Se~,ice Reprioritization in the General Fund: <br />Government category of taxes and cause a loss Services in the general fund could be reprioritized <br />of taxes levied fbr the library and youth/schools to dedicate a portion of the resources towards <br />programs. In addition, the funding would come annual debt service payments on a civic center or <br />in over time, rather than up front when capital police facility. This will probably need to be done <br />construction is occm-ring. For those reasons, this in order to pay for higher operating and mainte- <br />option seems undesirable, nance costs on the facilities too. <br /> <br />Facility Reserve: The City has been saving CDBG Non-Profit Grants: CDBG funds could <br />money for several years towards construction of a be used for leasehold improvements on any space <br />new civic center, including a police facility. The built into the project for the provision of social ser- <br />current balance in the Facility Reserve is approxi- vices by non-profit entities. The amount available <br />mately $6million. would be fairly small, and would include some <br /> significant restrictions on the use of funds. <br />Capitalization Charge for Downtown City <br />Offices: General City. office space in the down- Homeland Security Grants: There may be funds <br />town area pays a capitalization charge that's available for public safety puqooses from ttome- <br />meant to help offset a portion of the replacement land Security grants. <br /> <br />Civic visioning Committee - Report and Recommendations June 2004 Page <br /> <br /> <br />