Laserfiche WebLink
WET WEAl'HER FLOW MANAGEMENT PLAN <br /> <br /> · A description of projects recommended in the plan and their costs <br /> <br /> · A listing of the Policy Recommendations made in the plan <br /> <br /> · Next steps to be taken in completing the plan <br /> <br /> CAC members and staff from each City attended to present poster topics and answer citizen <br /> questions. Written comments were encouraged from attendees. Comments received <br /> induded the following: <br /> <br />1. The plan appears to be a balanced solution to a complex problem. <br /> <br />2. The need and magnitude of plant capacity increases should be determined after <br /> performing measures to decrease inflow and .infiltration into the system. <br /> <br />3. Private lateral rehabilitation should not be omitted as an element of the flow <br /> management plan even though this would be costly and politically difficult. <br /> <br />4. New pipeline collection systems should be tested and inspected to ensure that they <br /> provide the desired level of service and are not a contributor of excessive I/I. <br /> <br />5. Private sewer installation and inspeCtion should be given as high a priority as the <br /> publicly owned portion of the system, including the connection of the public sewer to <br /> the private system. <br /> <br />Formal responses to the comments were not distributed to individuals but are addressed <br />generally as follows: <br /> <br />Response to Comment 2: The plan is designed to take an incremental approach to the <br />implementation of improvements, with priority to system rehabili, tation to reduce IlL As <br />indicated in the lO-year implementation schedule, ongoing flow monitoring and public i <br />system rehabilitation are recommended in the plan, followed by plant improvements as <br />needecL Secondary treatment .capacity increases will be needed for wet and dry weather <br />conditions, while the magnitude and method to provide primary capacity increases will <br />continue to be investigatecL A formal r~ cvaluation of the management plan is <br />r~ommended by 2004 as indicated in Policy Issue No. 1Z <br /> <br />Response to Comment $: Private lateral rehabilitation has not been omitted from the plan but <br />has been recommended as a voluntary program to be developed in 2000/2001. This is <br />described in Policy Issue No. 2. <br /> <br />Response to Commel~ts 4 and 5: Inspection and testing of new publicly owned sewer pipelines <br />is the current construction practice for both Cities. The inspection and testing occurs at the <br />time of construction, and a visual inspecfi. 'on is performed at the completion of the warranty. <br />period. Public sewer rehabilitation and the connection of rehabilitated pipes to the private <br />hteral also are visually inspected-at the time of construction and at the end of the warranty <br />period. Private laterals are inspected and tested at the time of construction. <br /> <br />The materials presented at the open houses, the attendance sheet, and written comments <br />received are included in Appendix B. <br /> <br /> <br />