My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A - PH on MWMC/Metro Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-06/22/04JEO
>
Item A - PH on MWMC/Metro Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:57:24 PM
Creation date
6/17/2004 8:20:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/22/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1. Modifies the text on'page 28, preceding Table 3, and adds Tables 4a and 4b that ' <br /> identify MWMC Wastewater Treatment and Primary Collection System <br /> improvements, respectively. <br /> <br />2. Modifies Map 2, which shows Planned Wastewater Facilities, and adds Map 2a <br /> that concerns Existing Wastewater Facilities. <br /> <br />3. Modifies the existing narrative on "Wastewater System Condition Assessment" in <br /> Chapter IV. (Page 82). <br /> <br />4. Modifies existing paragraphs #1 and #2 under the discussion of"Wastewater'' in <br /> the subdivision entitled "Long-Term Service Availability Within Urbanizable <br /> Areas" in Chapter IV. (Page 97). <br /> <br />5. Adds new Table 16a (following Tab1e 16) entitled."MWMC Wastewater <br /> Treatment and Collection System Improvements, Rough Cost Estimate, and <br /> Timing Estimate." (Page 101) <br /> <br />6. Adds new Chapter VI regarding amendments to the PFSP: <br /> <br /> Metropolitan Area General Plan Amendment Criteria <br /> The proposed amendments are considered to be Type I Metro Plan amendments because <br /> they are non-site specific amendments to the Plan text. Amendments to the Plan text, <br /> which include Changes to functional plans such as TransPlan and the PFSP, and that are <br /> non-site specific require approval by all three governing bodies to become effective.2 <br /> Springfield, Eugene and Lane County each adopted identical Metro Plan amendment <br /> criteria into their respective implementing ordinances and codes. Springfield Code <br /> Section 7.070(3) (a & b), Eugene Code 9.128(3) (a & b), and Lane Code 12.225(2) (a & <br /> b) require that the amendment be consistent with relevant statewide planning goals and <br /> that the amendment will not make the Metro Plan internally inconsistent. Thes_e criteria <br /> are addressed as follows: · <br /> <br /> (a) The amendment must be consistent with the relevant statewide planning goals <br /> adopted bY the Land Conservation and Development'Commission; <br /> <br /> Goal 1 - Citizen Involvement <br /> To develop a citizen involvement program that insures the opp°rtunity for citizens. <br /> to be involved in all phases of the planning process. <br /> The two cities and the county have acknowledged land use codes that are intended <br /> to serve as the principal implementing ordinances for the Metro Plan. SDC Article <br /> 7 METRO PLAN AMENDMENTS and SDC Article 14 PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> prescribe the manner in which a Type I Metro Plan amendment must be noticed. <br /> Citizen involvement for a Type I Metro Plan amendment not related to an urban <br /> growth boundary amendment requires: 1) Notice to interested parties; 2) Notice <br /> <br /> 2 See SDC 7.070(1)(a), EC 9.7730(1)(a), and LC 12.225(1)(a)(i). <br /> <br /> Staff Report and Findings Page 3 1-5 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.