My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item A - PH on MWMC/Metro Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-06/22/04JEO
>
Item A - PH on MWMC/Metro Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:57:24 PM
Creation date
6/17/2004 8:20:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/22/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
162
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner.lnge asked what the impact would be for facilities that needed to be. bUilt if <br />the projections were r~ised or lowered. Mr. Noesen said one of things that could be impacted <br />would be the phasing of the tertiary filters. It wouldn't'necessarily enable the Commission to get dd <br />of, or have more 'filters, but would impact when they would need to be built, and may not impact <br />what needs to be built at ali. <br /> <br /> Regarding the allocations, Mr. Noesen said that the allocations that have been developed <br /> are a combination of what is in Chapter 8 of the Facilities Plan, plus w~ in the SDC <br /> methodology. The actual allocation of the 20-Year Project List will ~ the cost of those <br /> projects between growth and existing users. The development o~in Chapter 8 of the <br /> Facilities Plan and some of the numbers that are used in applyi~me from the SDC <br /> <br /> Mr. Noesen ~hen addressed the headworks exp~l~ referenced i~'s le~er. This is a <br />$12.8 million proje~ to expand prelimina~ treatmen1 ~sang r~io~~ Looking at the <br />application of the SDC me~odology to this p~ ~is 12~~h~r~ec~allocated to <br />average floTM and 87.5% is alloCated to peak' ~is po~~~-has to~aluated as <br />rehabilitation, ~paci~, or pe~o~ance~ The ~ ' c~aci~,' a~100% of <br />average flow is allocated to gro~h, and only 29.4% is allocated to gro~h. This <br />results in 38% of the total project cost to Ioesen said the population gro~h <br />over the study period is around 37%. the proj~ allocated to average flow. The <br />headworks is not only sewing peak se~ing e flow, and the allocation is a <br />li~le higher than the a~ual population Noesen added that for this <br />project, and all the other proje~s on the process is followed <br />applying the SDC ch proj ~e process be~een existing <br />users and future users. <br /> <br /> In addressing. ~ems HBA the the best/advanced technology might not have <br />been evaluated, Mr. Irocess. He stated many alternatives and <br />new technologies were showed that m-using the existing <br />infrastructu cost-effective solution to do for the <br />rate <br /> <br /> )mmissioner could divert to new, different technology in a few years <br /> Mr. Noesen in( ,lities Plan is a "roadmap" and is designed to be flexible, <br />and thi; change in th <br /> <br /> IT BY MEYER TO APPROVE THE MWMC FACILITIES <br />PLAN AND LIST. THE MOTION WAS SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />EVANS. <br /> <br /> Ms. Smith aske( if the motion could reflect approval of Resolution 04-04. <br /> <br /> IT WAS MOVED BY COMMISSIONER MEYER TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 04-04. THE <br />MOTION WAS SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER EVANS. THE MOTION PASSED WITH 6 <br />VOTING FOR THE MOTION AND ONE (COMMISSIONER MORRISON) OPPOSED. <br /> <br /> 4-60 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.