Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 4 <br /> To 05-06-04 Draft MWMC Minutes <br />was growth's contribution t° 298 mgds of peak flow which would include all of the <br />average flow that we are paying for under average flow. [glo, incorrect. Once <br />project costs are allocated to average flow they are no longer available to <br />be allocated to peak flow and vice versa.] Thc 29% cun'ently allocated to growth <br />for peak flow isn't supported by the data. [The 29% or 30 mgd of 102 mgd is <br />derived in Table C-2 of the SDC methodology and is supported by data. <br />The I/I assumed to be generated by growth is less than 30% of the !/I <br />generated by existing MWMC users. Some communities in the Willamette <br />Valley corridor are using 35%.] <br /> <br />I. How Much Capacity Do We Have? <br /> <br />General Facility Capacity Information: <br /> <br />The MWMC treatment facility was designed in 1977 and became operational twenty <br />years ago, in 1984. It was designed to serve a population of 277,100 persons and it was <br />estimated in 1977 that number of persons served by the facility would be reached in <br />2005. The current number of persons served by MWMC in 2004 is 217,690 persons, so · <br />the initial 1977 population projection that the facility would reach its service capacity <br />next year was substantially in err. Based solely on population to be served, the facility <br />would currently be used at 72.5% of its capacity [This assumption only works if ' <br />you assume that the level of treatment required in 1977 is the same as the <br />level of treatment required in 2025 which is not a correct assumption] is is <br />based solely on the original design. <br /> <br />"Design of the original WPCF (Water Pollution Control Facility) was based on <br />demographic and population data established in the mid-1970's. The facility was <br />designed to provide adequate sewerage capacity through the year 2005 for a projected <br />population of 277,100. This projection was made for the sewer service area that existed <br />in the 1970s. However, the growth rate during the 1980s was significantly less than <br />projected. This trend in the growth rate was common throughout much of Oregon <br />because of depressed economic conditions during the mid-1980s (April, 2004 Draft <br />MWMC Facilities Plan, page 1-6). <br /> <br />In addition, LCOG population projections for the 1990s were higher than the actual <br />numbers provided by the 2000 US Census. <br /> <br />Another factor significantly affected the projected use of the facility's capacity- water <br />conservation efforts. A substantial part of our wastewater, both dry weather flows and <br />wet weather flows, is just What the name suggests - water. I am not referring now to <br />inflow and infiltration (I/I), but rather the composition of the wastewater that is released <br />from homes, businesses, and industrial plants. Whether the wastewater originates from <br />the shower we take in the morning, the dishwashers at a restaurant, or a car wash, the vast <br />majority of our wastewater is simply water. The amount ofwastewater sent from homes <br />and businesses to the sanitary sewer pipes correlates so closely to our actual water usage <br />that our winter water consumption is the basis upon which our MWMC sewer bill is <br /> <br /> Attachment 4 <br /> Page 5 of 17 4-8 <br /> <br /> <br />