Laserfiche WebLink
ECLA: Baseline Assumptions ECONorthwest July 2009 Page 11 <br />addressed through redevelopment, generally from 5% to 20% of new residential <br />development. <br />6 <br />? <br />Potential range of assumption: We found no studies or data that attempt to <br /> <br />estimate the amount of commercial and industrial infill and redevelopment <br />that occurred in Eugene over the past decade. It is clear, however, that infill <br />and redevelopment occurred, especially along Coburg Road. A 2002 study in <br />the Portland Metro area suggest that about 26% of employment land would be <br />accommodated through redevelopment over the 2002-2022 period. <br />7 <br />? <br />CAC and TAC discussion: CAC and TAC have not discussed this assumption <br /> <br />in great enough depth to have suggestions for different assumptions from <br />more than one committee member. One TAC member suggested that the most <br />appropriate places for redevelopment is in mixed use centers and downtown. <br />? <br />Current technical recommendation for baseline assumption: Our preliminary <br /> <br />recommendation is to assume redevelopment of 10% of forecast industrial <br />employment, 15% of commercial employment, and 35% of retail employment. <br />? <br />Data source: No data about commercial and industrial redevelopment is <br /> <br />currently available. <br />Employment density <br />Employment density is the density of employment (measured in employees per acre) <br />locating in commercial and industrial plan designations. Forecasting employment land <br />need based on forecasts of employment growth requires a conversion, either explicit or <br />implicit, of employment growth (number of new employees) to land need based on <br />assumptions about employment density. This can be accomplished through use of <br />assumptions about the number of employees per acre (EPA). In 2006, Eugene’s overall <br />employment density was 22 employees per acre. Employment densities in Eugene <br />varied by use and mixture of uses, as follows: <br />? <br />Industrial densities ranged from about 5 employees per gross acre (EPA) in <br /> <br />heavy industrial areas to nearly 20 EPA in light or campus industrial. <br />? <br />Commercial densities varied from 30 EPA in mixed retail and office sites to 93 <br /> <br />EPA in downtown. <br />? <br />Retail densities varied from about 20 EPA to about 37 EPA at Oakway Center. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> ECONorthwest used this method in studies for the following cities: Ashland, McMinnville, The Dalles, <br />6 <br />Pendleton, Ontario, and Sandy. Metro uses a “refill”rate to account for employment accommodated through <br />redevelopment. In Metro’s 2002 Urban Growth Report, they assumed a refill rate of about 26% for commercial and <br />industrial lands. <br /> Metro’s “2002-2022 Urban Growth Report: an Employment Land Needs Analysis,” December 2002. Accessible <br />7 <br />from http://library.oregonmetro.gov/files/ugr-employment.pdf <br /> <br /> <br />