Laserfiche WebLink
Councilor Taylor asked how much space the City was currently renting in the downtown area. City <br />Manager Jon Ruiz replied that he did not know, but he would find out from Facility Division Manager Mike <br />Penwell, He added that he was not certain space taken in the Beam project would come from currently <br />leased space. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor asked if the City was delaying the project by negotiating with LCC. Mr. Braud assured <br />her that the City was not. He explained that Beam Development had to attract a high percentage of pre- <br />lease commitments in order to start, which was challenging in the present economy. He said lenders would <br />require 80 to 100 percent building occupancy before financing the project, a big change from the previous <br />year. <br /> <br />Mr. Ruiz thought if the City could “work a deal” with LCC, it could accelerate the process. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor asked if staff was confident that LCC could raise the money. Mr. Braud replied that this <br />was something LCC had to make progress on. He said the college still had some work to do and needed to <br />accelerate the project in order to attract funding sources, such as stimulus money which was contingent on <br />being shovel ready. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka understood the current economic influences on the project. He liked the idea of having <br />LCC downtown. He said Beam Development had been looking all over town for tenants. He felt that the <br />project could jumpstart the downtown area. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy expressed appreciation to staff for its “hard and inventive work” to keep the project moving <br />forward. She also appreciated Beam Development’s commitment to the community. She stressed that the <br />situation was not one of someone “dragging their feet.” She also wanted to convey her appreciation to LCC <br />for taking an interest in the project. She hoped the economy would improve soon, and underscored that the <br />lack of development was not due to a lack of interest. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon asked if LCC wanted to take over the entire development. Mr. Braud replied that LCC <br />was looking for 80,000 square feet and the Centre Court Building was not that large. In response to a <br />follow-up question from Councilor Solomon, Mr. Braud stated that ownership was critical to LCC because <br />of bond funding requirements. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon asked if it “all fell apart” would the City lose money. Mr. Braud responded that the <br />City would not lose money, but Beam had a financial stake in it because of carrying costs. He said the City <br />was able to service its Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) loan with Beam’s payments. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon echoed the Mayor’s compliments to staff. She observed that the situation was <br />extraordinarily complicated and frustrating. She believed that if the City stuck with it, the project would <br />come to fruition. <br /> <br />Councilor Brown indicated he would support the extension. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling clarified for the public that the item did not come to the council as a surprise in the <br />newspaper. The information was on the council packet delivered on May 22 and the council had prior <br />knowledge of it before it hit the press. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka referred to the letter from Beam Development, on page 143 of the Agenda Packet. He <br />pointed to the fourth bullet point and said he interpreted it as indicating that the City could have to pay some <br />financing charges on the property if the project did not get going within six months. Mr. Braud agreed with <br />that interpretation. He said if Beam spent the next six months trying to court LCC to the site and then LCC <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council May 26, 2009 Page 11 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />