Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Zako remarked that the WEC envisioned phasing in a multiway boulevard over several years and was <br />concerned about the impact on existing property owners and the ability to acquire right-of-way naturally as <br />properties changed owners. Mr. Reed added that the WEC’s intent was to address traffic and felt its <br />recommendations would achieve that. He said a multiway boulevard was no less expensive than the West <br />Eugene Parkway (WEP), but the WEP was a narrow, single-purpose transportation solution while the <br />multiway boulevard incorporated all of the other elements that needed to be addressed, such as the <br />environment, social justice and land use. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka commended the WEC for its work and ability to reach consensus. He liked the direction of <br />WEC recommendations and the inclusiveness of the process. He pointed out that Franklin Boulevard <br />provided an example of a multiway boulevard in the vicinity of Walnut Station. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka, seconded by Mr. Clark, moved to accept the West Eugene Collabora- <br />tive’s report and ask the City Manager to plan a work session or work sessions to <br />discuss and plan for the potential implementation of the West Eugene Collabora- <br />tive’s recommendations. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor stated that the WEC had consciously avoided taking the place of jurisdictions and agencies that <br />were charged with the responsibility for developing final detailed plans. He said an important outcome of <br />the WEC process was to develop guidelines that provided a good chance of success. He said short, medium <br />and long-term recommendations offered opportunities to move forward with some immediate actions while <br />developing long-range plans. The concept of a multiway boulevard gained acceptance from WEC members <br />because it could be accomplished in the long-term and address the problems in West Eugene. He noted that <br />the WEC process had been observed statewide and the model had gained the interest of the Oregon <br />Department of Transportation. <br /> <br />Ms. Solomon expressed an interest in immediate measures that could be taken to improve traffic flow on <br />th <br />West 11 Avenue. She noted that the WEC report had discussed inner and outer alternative routes and <br />th <br />asked how they would be improved to take traffic off West 11 Avenue. Mr. Reed said better signage <br />would help direct drivers to alternate routes for avoiding congestion. He said improvements could also <br />include signal timing, additional turn lanes and widened intersections. Rob Inerfeld, Public Works <br />th <br />Department, added that the City’s West 11 Avenue study would explore options for the main corridor and <br />th <br />inner and outer alternative routes enhancements were also being considered, including a roundabout at 5 <br />Avenue and Seneca Street. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling thanked the WEC for considering transportation issues between Veneta and Eugene and beyond. <br />He echoed Mr. Clark’s concerns about a multiway boulevard and the cost of right-of-way acquisitions. He <br />hoped that issues related to local access lanes would also be discussed in a work session. He referred to the <br />WEC’s recommendation regarding rezoning of industrial land and noted there was also land zoned <br />residential that would never be developed. He asked if the rezoning would occur before the City’s land <br />supply study was completed or deducted from the inventory at a later date. He said dedicated transit lanes <br />were difficult because of the City’s current building code and setback requirements that placed buildings <br />th <br />close to the street; that should be a concern with any redevelopment on West 11 Avenue. He questioned <br />whether any changes to the building code to address the problem would apply only to West Eugene or be <br />imposed citywide. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council April 27, 2009 Page 5 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />