Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Piercy closed the Public Forum. She expressed her appreciation for the time people took to come <br />and testify. She said while she did not know how much they would agree or disagree; she appreciated Mr. <br />Siekel-Zdzienicki and Ms. Hutson’s input and their concern for their community. She related that the <br />former Police Auditor had provided information to her regarding the taser cams. She hoped the City would <br />consider purchasing them. <br /> <br />Councilor Taylor thanked everyone for coming and providing testimony. She recalled that she had been <br />saying that the street assessment policy was not fair for years. She opined that if the City “did it to everyone <br />at once, there would be a revolution.” She believed that the loans from the City should be no- interest. She <br />supported allowing people to wait to pay when the property changed hands and assessing people in the cul <br />de sacs. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark echoed appreciation for the people who spoke before the council. He agreed that in the best <br />world there would be a great chain of evidence in both video and audio in those cases where a taser was <br />deployed. He noted that he and the other Police Commissioners had spoken of this. He said the challenge of <br />putting the cam on the taser was that it was only activated when the taser was pointed at the person; the <br />lead-up to that point was missed, which sometimes provided some pretty important information. He agreed <br />that having a better video record would be an improvement, but thought they needed to find a different way <br />of capturing it. He hoped the Police Chief, and staff, were working on ways that could be done. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark asked Mr. Schoening to remind him of the number of miles of improved roads versus <br />unimproved roads there were in Eugene. He noted that he had voted ‘no’ on the Elmira Road project. Mr. <br />Schoening responded that Eugene had approximately 500 miles of roads, 50 of which were unimproved. <br />Councilor Clark surmised that 10 percent of the roads were subject to the assessment model, if the neighbors <br />decided to improve them, but 450 miles of the roads had already been paid for by the homeowners. Mr. <br />Schoening affirmed that the homeowners had either paid through assessments or in the purchase price of <br />their homes. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark said he would love to hear from the residents what would be fair to the people who had <br />already paid the higher price of their home to live on an improved street. He also wondered if any studies <br />had been conducted on whether home values had changed on an improved road. Mr. Schoening responded <br />that such a study had not been conducted. Councilor Clark said he would also favor paying for the <br />assessments upon the sale of a property, but this would mean the City would have to establish a fund to find <br />the money in order to do so. <br /> <br />2. CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> <br />A. Approval of City Council Minutes <br /> <br /> - April 8, 2009, Work Session <br />- April 8, 2009, Executive Session <br />- April 13, 2009, Work Session <br />- April 15, 2009, Work Session <br /> - April 20, 2009, Public Hearing <br /> B. Approval to Tentative Working Agenda <br /> C. Appointment of Lane Workforce Partnership Board <br /> D. Approval of Community Development Block Grant Recovery Funds Allocation <br /> E. Adoption of Resolution 4978 Approving a Multiple-Unit Property Tax Exemption for <br />th <br />Residential Property Located at 362 East 12 Avenue, Eugene, Oregon (Midtown Terrace <br />LLC, Applicant) <br /> F. Ratification of Intergovernmental Relations Committee Minutes of April 15, 2009, April <br />22, 2009, and April 29, 2009 <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council May 26, 2009 Page 4 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />