Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Corey confirmed, in response to a follow-up question from Councilor Zelenka, that 10 percent of the <br />population of Eugene did not have garbage service and the fee, if passed, would be a pass through. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka requested that staff bring back a mechanism for a reasonable incremental administration <br />cost. He believed it would be a minimal amount. He also asked staff to bring back language exempting <br />schools. In response to people who asked the council to wait, he said the City had been waiting already for <br />“years and years.” He opined that the surcharge was one of the more equitable ideas the council committee <br />had come up with. He supported it. <br /> <br />Councilor Poling opposed the surcharge. He had voted against the surcharge each of the three times it had <br />come before the council and Budget Committee. It did not make sense to him to exact this charge. He <br />predicted that if the surcharge passed, there would be a referendum placed on the ballot to rescind it. He <br />considered such a charge to be “an easy target.” He said there were many heavy trucks traveling on the city <br />streets and it was not fair to single out garbage haulers. <br /> <br />Councilor Clark commented that taxes were “the closest thing to eternal life.” He predicted that the <br />surcharge would increase over time, if enacted, and would never go away. He indicated he would oppose the <br />surcharge, adding that if it appeared it might pass, he would move to refer it to the voters. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon asked that any amendment to exempt schools include private schools of 200 or more <br />students. She also wanted to amend the surcharge to ensure that it would remain at five percent. <br /> <br />Legal Counsel Kathryn Brotherton stated that exempting schools, private or public, would be difficult to <br />execute because the tax would be on the garbage haulers and how they passed it through would be up to <br />them. She said they would not be able to carve out certain payers. <br /> <br />Councilor Solomon asked if it could be capped. Ms. Brotherton replied that the fee would be delegated to <br />the City Manager, as it was currently written. She said the councilors could add codified language to do so. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy understood that the council could not create any language that would prohibit future councils <br />from making a different decision. <br /> <br />Councilor Zelenka asked if it would be possible to give the schools a rebate. Ms. Brotherton responded that <br />they could not for the same reasons they could not exempt the schools. She said it might be possible to <br />subsidize something else that the schools paid to the City. She added that the garbage haulers could choose <br />not to assess the schools. <br /> <br />In response to a follow-up question from Councilor Zelenka, Ms. Brotherton stated that the rate of return for <br />garbage haulers was approximately 11 percent. <br /> <br />Mr. Corey said the ordinance was structured so that the haulers would be made whole. He stated that what <br />staff had shown in the agenda materials was that exemptions from the charge would not work as well as the <br />council, by policy, determining that there were one or more groups that it wanted to hold harmless. He <br />explained that the council would not do this through the ordinance itself; it would have to come from a <br />subsequent policy discussion. <br /> <br />Councilor Ortiz said if the surcharge passed and was not referred to the voters, she would want the City to <br />make some kind of agreement with School District 4J and the Bethel School District to mitigate the cost. <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 8, 2009 Page 8 <br /> Regular Meeting <br /> <br />