My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 06/15/09 Public Hearing
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2009
>
CC Minutes - 06/15/09 Public Hearing
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:29:19 AM
Creation date
8/14/2009 12:32:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/15/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
de sacs, the council should see if there was not a way to make the assessments more equitable for everyone. <br />He had lived on Crest Drive for most of his life and agreed that the streets needed improving. <br /> <br />Ron Gietter <br />, 990 Sundance Road, stated that he was speaking on behalf of the 23 homeowners who were in <br />the South Point Homeowners Association. He had lived in that area for 29 years. It seemed to him that the <br />roads were just as bad 29 years ago as they were in the present. He had been pleased to see that the City <br />was taking action to improve the roads. He acknowledged the work that the City had done collaboratively <br />with neighborhood residents to come up with a sensitive design for the project. He recalled that in the <br />meetings there had been discussions of how the project would be paid for. He found it hard to believe that <br />th <br />the assessments were a surprise to a lot of people “in the 11 hour.” He thought the process had been <br />“great,” noting that the council and Mayor had praised the project. He stated that when he had bought his <br />lot in South Point, he had paid for the roads. He said the assessment policy might take years of discussion, <br />but the roads needed to be fixed now. He pointed out that delaying the project would run the risk of having <br />costs skyrocket again. <br /> <br />Wendy Dudelheim <br />, 3385 Storey Boulevard, asked that the council reevaluate assessments. She said the <br />assessment was a tremendous burden. She echoed the suggestion that assessments be spread over the <br />residents who accessed their cul de sac properties via the LID streets. She pointed out that other traffic <br />traveled on the streets, notably traffic coming from Lane County roads, and suggested that the City see if it <br />would be possible to garner funding from the county. She felt that the assessment policy was archaic. She <br />added that she did not have children and wondered if some of the taxes she paid for the public school system <br />could be diverted into the roads. <br /> <br />Steve Hirons <br />, 736 Crest Drive, stated that his house was for sale and the assessment would affect the <br />selling price. He averred that 70 percent of the traffic consisted of vehicles traveling through the area and <br />not people who lived there. He reiterated that 65 percent of the area residents had signed a petition of <br />remonstrance. He declared that it was a “terrible time” to burden people with a bill to fix the streets. He <br />asked that the council consider adding more subsidies given that the bids had come in lower. He predicted <br />that a lot of people would face a painful burden. He said the residents in the LID would welcome monetary <br />involvement from the residents who could only access their houses via Crest Drive. <br /> <br />John Rude <br />, 1207 Courtney Place, Ward 2, spoke on behalf of the Crest Dive Community Team Advisory <br />Group. The association believed the Crest Drive project was in jeopardy due to the remonstrance. He asked <br />that the council have a solution in mind, should it honor the remonstration. He said there was no need to <br />change the assessment, but the council could influence how the City and the neighbors shared the burden of <br />the cost. He noted that the City had estimated its share to be $3.5 million and the residents’ share to be $2.6 <br />million. He related that the recent bids had changed the overall cost from $5.75 million to $3.79 million. He <br />noted that the City’s portion had dropped by 44 percent, but the residents’ portion dropped only 22 percent. <br />He said though this improved the situation, it only dropped the residents’ portion from approximately <br />$20,000 to approximately $15,000. He suggested that the City could consider paying its original estimate, <br />which would drop the residents’ portion to $641,376. He thought the City could also cobble together money <br />from its potential swap of $1 million with the Lane County Road Fund. He said the funding sources could <br />create a more reasonable assessment, approximately $5,000 per property, and would help the remonstrators <br />support the project to move forward. <br /> <br />Rick Robertson <br />, 839 Crest Drive, Ward 2, said he had purchased his house knowing about the assessment. <br />He supported the project as designed and wanted the project to proceed as planned. He asked the council to <br />look at all of the options to reduce the financial burden of the assessment policy, even if it would not reduce <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 15, 2009 Page 8 <br /> Public Hearing <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.