Item 2A - Approval of Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

stated he would not support the motion and requested more information that was empirically-based, not attitudinally-based. Mayor Torrey said that a survey conducted of local businesses last year regarding perceptions of the business climate in Eugene listed the top four issues as: · Simplify the permit process and dealings · Relax, revise local government regulations · Adopt pro-business policies · Employ economic development strategies Mayor Torrey said that implementing a moratorium without providing an opportunity for a legitimate process that included a work session and public hearing was wrong and referred to previous action on housing standards as the appropriate approach. He observed that the pressure appeared to be to stop Wal- Mart and not pressure to stop 50,000 square foot buildings. Mr. Kelly explained that Ms. Taylor's motion did direct the city manager to bring back an ordinance to impose a moratorium and the ordinance would be subject to the usual public input and public hearing process, which was the same approach the council had taken with housing standards. Mr. Kelly proposed a friendly amendment to add the language %taff should begin investigation of possible long-term techniques related to economic issues, such as impact analysis or formula business regulation, used in other cities." Ms. Taylor accepted the amendment as the maker of the motion. Ms. Bettman accepted the motion as the second. Continuing, Mr. Kelly said a moratorium was a blunt, short-term and temporary solution that allowed time for a more permanent solution to be crafted. He expressed discomfort with quoting the business climate survey because of the 15 percent response rate. Ms. Taylor remarked that her motion was the same as the one she had made at a previous meeting and was prepared by Mr. Klein. She said all the moratorium did was to provide the council time to think, and if it was possible to stop the current application, she would want to do that. Ms. Nathanson declared that if the issue was fundamentally about economic development and concern for local business, then the council should ask the Mayor's Economic Development Committee to discuss ways to support local businesses, the possible impacts and unintended consequences. Ms. Bettman said that she had raised aspects of the issue during economic development and land use discussions and was responsible for the 50,000 square foot limitation in nodes and the 35,000 square foot limitation of a footprint. She said whether the motion passed or failed, it was her intent to move to ask the Mayor's Economic Development Committee to consider not just the economic development issues embedded in %ig box" chain store development, but consider the land use issues as well with respect to efficient use of land within the UGB and impacts on transportation, tax base, and service provision. She said that neighboring communities also had small businesses to protect and grow. Mr. Meisner thanked Mr. Kelly for his amendment to the motion and pointed out that the motion did direct staff to develop an ordinance for a moratorium on accepting or processing application for retail establish- MINUTES--Eugene City Council May 24, 2004 Page 9 Work Session