Laserfiche WebLink
Design criteria are based, in part, upon regulatory requirements. The State of Oregon has <br />established a standard that sets the one-in-five-year storm event as the applicable size of rain <br />event that the sewer system must effectively convey and treat without any occurrence of an <br />overflow. This standard was developed with public input, adopted by the State's Environmental <br />Quality Commission, and approved by the U.S. EPA. It applies to all wastewater facilities in the <br />state operating under an NPDES permit. The MWMC 2004 Facilities Plan translates this <br />standard into design criteria, with an objective of preventing wastewater overflows under <br />conditions that do not meet the 5-year storm frequency. While there has been discussion in the <br />public forums that an overflow frequency of once every five years is too conservative, it is <br />nonetheless a legal, regulatory requirement. Since 1995 there have been 7 separate wastewater <br />overflow events from the MWMC system reported to the Department of Environmental Quality <br />(DEQ), as required by the NPDES permit regulating the regional wastewater facilities. The <br />total volume of the overflows associated with these events has been estimated at over <br />260, 000, 000 gallons. It is important to note that most of the years since 1995 have been part of <br />a drought cycle, and that during this period the Eugene-Springfield area has experienced some <br />of the driest years on record. Modeling done for the Facilities Plan estimates that the peak flows <br />from the Eugene/Springfield system associated with the 5-year storm event will reach 277 <br />million gallons per day (MGD) by the year 2025 (based upon the assumption of continuing <br />rehabilitation of public sewer pipe by Eugene and Springfield). The existing rated peak flow <br />capacity of the Eugene/Springfield Water Pollution Control Facility is 175 MGD. Statistical <br />analysis of the historical flow record also indicates that the 175 MGD current rated capacity <br />will be exceeded 4 days per year under existing conditions. DEQ requires adequate treatment <br />capacity by the year 2010 to prevent system overflows from winter storms, therefore in order to <br />meet the State standard, the peak flow capacity of the treatment facilities will have to be <br />increased from their current level. <br /> <br />(3) My work on Region 2050 has made me even more interested in the importance of <br />jurisdictions cooperating where possible. I thought Mayor Volta from Coburg made some <br />excellent points about their needs. I'm concerned about the groundwater mgmt area due to <br />nitrate pollution, and don't care for the fact that if Coburg builds their own plant, that will mean <br />an additional river outflow. <br /> <br /> I'll be interested in the answers to the questions that the Mayor emailed about the Coburg issue, <br /> and want to ask an additional timing question. I don't want to hold up Eugene's adoption of the <br /> plan until the Coburg issue is resolved, but I would like to know how the Eugene City Council <br /> could indicate our support for seriously studying the ability of Coburg to be linked to the plant. <br /> <br /> Please see response to questions about Coburg, below. <br /> <br /> (4) The executive summary of the plan says the capacity deficit in wet weather will be 102 mgd <br /> (we have a capacity of 175 now, and need 277 in year 2025). Do the projects in the plan build <br /> the capacity to cover that deficit? More than that deficit? Less? Why? <br /> <br /> The Facilities Plan outlines the need for additional peak flow capacity, and the 20-Year Project <br /> List includes the specific capital improvements intended to alleviate the peak flow limitations <br /> and to address the deficit--no more and no less. The need is established by State regulations <br /> (overflow frequency related to the one-in-five-year storm event), and the capital projects on the <br /> list will result in the peak flow capacity necessary to comply with this standard. <br /> <br /> (5) Let me play devil's advocate. If (for example) the Eugene City Council didn't give our ok to <br /> the project list/plan now, and instead did so five years from now, what would be the most likely <br /> negative consequences? <br /> <br /> <br />