My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 7 - Action MWMC Fac. Plan
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2004
>
CCAgenda-06/28/04Mtg
>
Item 7 - Action MWMC Fac. Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:54:44 PM
Creation date
6/24/2004 8:57:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
6/28/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
· On June 14, 2004, a public hearing was convened. Written documentation submitted at the public <br /> hearing was distributed in the Thursday, June 17, 2004, council packets. A brief summary of the <br /> public hearing and a listing of related attachments included with this AlS follows. <br /> <br />Public Hearing <br />On June 14, 2004, the council held a public hearing on the 2004 MWMC Facilities Plan and 20-Year <br />Project List. Fourteen people signed up to provide oral testimony. Seven offered testimony in support <br />of the plan and list, two opposed the plan and list, and five were neutral or addressed the issue of <br />extending wastewater services to the City of Coburg. <br /> <br />In general, testimony in favor of approving the 2004 MWMC Facilities Plan and 20-Year Project List <br />commented on the justified need for the proposed projects, the appropriateness of the plan, and the <br />effectiveness of the Citizens Advisory Committee and public outreach processes. Testimony opposed to <br />approval of the plan and project list questioned whether the plan is the right one to address need, <br />whether the planning criteria (and related state standards) are overly conservative, whether there has <br />been sufficient public process, and whether coordination of the Facilities Plan and the SDC <br />methodology has been done correctly. Included as attachments to this AlS are the following: 1) a copy <br />of the transcript of oral testimony, including brief responses to some of the questions raised in the <br />testimony; 2) a memo to the council responding to questions submitted from the mayor and councilors <br />on the 2004 MWMC Facilities Plan and 20-Year Project List, as time did not permit discussion by the <br />council following the public hearing; 3) technical and legal responses to several of the written letters <br />submitted at the hearing which were distributed in the Thursday, June 17, 2004, packet; 4) a list of <br />documentation submitted by staff for inclusion in the public record; and 5) a memo to the Lane County <br />Board of Commissioners on peak wastewater flows. <br /> <br />Policy Issues <br />The primary policy question before the council is: Does the council agree with the MWMC that the <br />2004 MWMC Facilities Plan and 20-Year Project List provide for the wastewater treatment needs of the <br />community in a cost-effective and responsible manner? A related issue is the financial implications of <br />the proposed 2004 MWMC Facilities Plan and associated 20-Year Project List. Funding of the <br />improvements identified in the plan will come from user rates and systems development charges <br />(SDCs). Approximately two-thirds of the system's users are located in Eugene. Adoption of the 20- <br />Year Project List is required to establish a basis for the proposed SDC rates needed to fund growth's <br />equitable share of capital improvements. <br /> <br />Wastewater collection and treatment infrastructure are critical components in the support of community <br />and environmental health and well-being. Periodic updates to wastewater facilities are necessary to <br />ensure that the infrastructure remains adequate to handle the projected demands for wastewater <br />collection and treatment without an interruption or deficiency in service that can lead to public health <br />risks, damage to the environment, or economic restrictions due to sewer connection moratoriums. <br /> <br />Previous plans, established policies, strategies, significant modeling, evaluation, and citizen involvement <br />provide the foundation for the 2004 MWMC Facilities Plan and 20-Year Project List. The plan provides <br />the most cost-effective set of capital improvements to meet capacity and performance needs while <br />utilizing existing plant assets and building new plant expansions only where necessary. Existing <br />commission policies and guidance, the wastewater discharge permit requirements, and state/federal <br />regulations have provided the context for the 2004 MWMC Facilities Plan. No new policies were <br />developed in connection with the proposed plan. <br /> <br /> L:\CMO\2004 Council Agendas\M040628\S0406287.doc <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.