Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENTF <br /> <br />MEMORANDUM CH2MHILL <br /> <br />Response to Written Testimony at Eugene City <br />Council Public Hearing on the MWMC Wastewater <br />Facilities Plan and SDC Methodology <br /> <br />TO: Troy McAllister/MWMC Project Manager <br />FROM: Matt Noesen/CH2M HILL Project Manager <br />DATE: June 18, 2004 <br /> <br />The purpose of this memorandum is to respond to some of the questions and comments that <br />were submitted into the public record at the June 14, 2004, Eugene City Council Public <br />Hearing on the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC) Wastewater <br />Facilities Plan and SDC Methodology. <br /> <br />June 13, 2004, Letter from Home Builders Association of Lane County, <br />Re: MWMC System Development Charge Methodology <br /> <br />Page 3, Last Paragraph, Last Sentence; Page 4, First Paragraph, First Sentence: 'The <br />question is "How was that capacity determined?"?' <br /> <br />The text in Appendix C of the SDC Methodology provides a detailed derivation of these <br />capacity numbers presented in Table C-1 of the SDC Methodology. The development of <br />these numbers was presented and discussed at numerous SDC Citizen Advisory Committee <br />(CAC) sessions from January through March 2004, and modifications were made based on <br />the CAC's input. The CAC provided a majority recommendation on the "Existing and <br />future capacity needs" topic (see March 31, 2004, memorandum from CAC to MWMC). <br /> <br />Capacity Assessment (Pages 4 through 12) <br /> <br />Regarding the issue of capacity assessment, please refer to the following documents that <br />have previously addressed this issue: <br /> <br />· Facilities Plan Question 10 of Attachment 3 - Frequently Asked Questions (pages 8 and <br /> 9) of the April 16, 2004, Memorandum from MWMC General Manager to MWMC <br /> <br />· Draft Meeting minutes from May 6, 2004, MWMC Commissioner meeting (beginning at <br /> the last paragraph on page 6) <br /> <br />· May 4, 2004, letter from DEQ to CH2M HILL <br /> <br />· June 14, 2004, letter from DEQ to Lane County Board of County Commissioners <br /> <br />To summarize all of these previous materials, CH2M HILL has conducted the Eugene- <br />Springfield Water Pollution Control Facility (WPCF) capacity assessment consistent with <br />DEQ guidelines, with standard accepted engineering principles and practices, and with <br /> <br />C:\DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\CEEXELF\LOCAL SETTINGS\TEMPORARY INTERNET FILES\OLK3B~AIS HBALETTERSFROMCH2 FINAL DRAFT 061804. DOC 1 <br /> <br /> <br />