Laserfiche WebLink
MWMC FACILmES PLAN <br /> <br />reduction conclusions developed using City of Eugene data would also apply to the <br />Springfield system. <br /> <br />The City of Eugene has foc~ased its wastewater rehabilitation efforts on sUb-basins with high <br />wet weather to dry weather flow ratios. The City has extensive video inspection data <br />showing collection system defects. These data have been evaluated by staff who have <br />assigned deficiency ratings to pipe reaches. These deficiency ra~-~gs, along with flow <br />monitoring, have been the basis for prioritizing and implementing City of Eugene public- <br />only system rehabilitation. <br /> <br />The majority of the lines rehabilitated to date were 8 inches in diameter. For the most part, <br />the main line was 5 to 10 feet deep and the average depth of the service lines was about <br />4 feet deep at the edge of the right-of-way. <br /> <br />Eugene's comprehensive public system rehabilitation approacA includes rehabilitating the <br />majority of the main line, building services and connections, and manholes with_in the right- <br />of-way. City staff have most often selected trenchless liner as the rehabilitation method. <br />Replacing building service cormections at the main and sections of service lines located <br />within the public fight-of-way has also been a major component of the City's rehabilitation <br />effort. For building service lines within the public right-of-way, the City has installed, <br />through open excavation, new PVC pipe with rubber-gasketed joints and taps at the main <br />line. An additional component of the rehabilitation program involves mod/b/Lng manholes <br />to reduce the surface inflow potential, and sealing the interior barrel sections and bases <br />(where needed) with internal cement-based material to reduce or elLminate iruCiltration. In a <br />few cases, the City performed, a spot repair on a segment of pipe instead of lifting the whole <br />pipe. For these cases, the whole segment and its associated length were cour~ted as being <br />rehabilitated. <br /> <br />With regard to RDII reductions attributable to system rehabilitation, Eugene-Springfield's <br />experience was compared with that of other agencies within and outside of Oregon. As in <br />Eugene and Springfield, monitoring data from other agencies were ~j/3ically obtained <br />within a few years of completing system rehabilitation projects, so the data were not <br />necessarily representative of RDII reduction over the long-term. Data representing RDII <br />reduction over the long-term were not identified. In general, agencies were found to address <br />system rehabilitation in one of three ways: <br /> <br />1. Rehabilitation of main lines only (no portion of the lateral). <br /> <br />2. Rehabilitation of main lines and lower laterals (that portion of the lateral in the public <br /> right-of-way). <br /> <br />3. Rehabilitation of main lines as well as upper and lower laterals (the entire lateral, both in <br /> the public right-of-way and on private property to the struch~e served). <br /> <br />Hydraulic Modeling <br />A hydraulic model was developed to depict existing and future flows in the wastewater <br />collection system, and the expected RDII reduction benefits in the system for both public- <br />only and public and private rehabilitation efforts based on the estimated RDII reductions <br />attributable to system rehabilitation. <br /> <br /> MW~C_40_REV8 DOC <br /> <br /> <br />