Laserfiche WebLink
6. DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />TABLE 6.1.2-1 <br />MWMC Wastewater Collection System Wet Weather Flow Management Plan SeLected Alternative <br /> (WWFMP) <br />MWMC Facilities Plan, Eugene-Springfield <br /> <br /> Component of WWFMP Description <br /> <br /> · No Storage <br /> <br />Sub-Area Solution W25 (Eugene) · Public system rehabilitation in 21 sub-basins <br /> · Insta~lation of valve at 14th and Tyler <br /> · Upgrade to screw pumps at treatment plant <br /> · No storage <br /> <br />Strategy to Manage Excess Flow at WPCF for Existing - Manage 100% of 82 mgd excess flow rate and <br />Conditions 59.4 MG excess volume by adding pdmary <br /> clarification capacity to the WPCF. <br /> <br />MG = million gallons <br />mgd = million gallons per day <br /> <br />The solution set in Table 6.1.2-1 includes those aspects of the WWFMP that were cost - <br />effective in the optimization analysis relative to competing alternative technologies. <br /> <br />Contributing to this recommendation were the following factors: <br /> <br /> It is the least-cost alternative. <br /> <br /> It relies heavily on RDII reduction of the public system, which is considered to be the <br /> most implementable approach to RDII reduction. <br /> <br /> RDII reduction has the dual benefit of achieving and maintaining good, long-term <br /> system pipeline conditions. <br /> <br /> Each city is already performing rehabilitation at various levels; therefore, this alternative <br /> builds on current programs. <br /> <br /> This alternative is consistent with the current theme within many cities of a sustainable <br /> approach to developing infrastructure programs. This approach promotes creating <br /> increased efficiency from existing systems versus accepting poor performance from <br /> some portions of the system and building more facilities to compensate for them. <br /> <br />o It has a minimum of additional pipeline requirements and associated disruption. <br /> <br />e It does not require storage facilities that could pose aesthetic and siting issues. <br /> <br /> The selected systemwide solution was evaluated under estimates of bmldout conditions and <br /> flows. To achieve sub-area solutions under bufldout conditions, additional pUblic-only <br /> system rehabilitation was evaluated and found to provide an acceptable solution. <br /> <br /> The 10-year Wet Weather Flow Management Plan Implementation Schedule is given in <br /> Figure 6.1.2-2. As mentioned previously, since the adoption of the WWFMP, both Eugene <br /> and Springfield have put into action positive management practices for the wastewater <br /> system as outlined in the WWFMP, and have aggressively pursued RDII source <br /> collection <br /> <br /> MW~IC_8 O_FIEV1LDOC 6-5 <br /> <br /> <br />