Laserfiche WebLink
MWMC FACIUI'IES PLAN <br /> <br />subsequent anoxic selector of the following cell where derfitrificafion occurs. Therefore, the <br />capital and operating costs associated with the nitrified mixed liquor pumping equipment <br />are el/m/hated. RAS pumping/s required and RAS performs a dual function of biomas,s <br />return as well as nitrate redrculation from the secondary clarifiers. <br /> <br />The step-feed anoxic selector process provides for control of sludge settleabffity through <br />selective organism growth, effectively reducing the sludge volume index (SVI). The <br />reduction in SVIs enables the secondary clarifiers to be rated for a higher design solids <br />loading rate. It is the effect of this increase in biological capacity in combination with <br />improved sludge settleabflity that would allow the WPCF to increase its capacity using the <br />existing aeration basin volume and secondary darifiers. It was assumed that as part of the <br />secondary treatment modifications, the secondary clarffiers would be modified to include <br />baffling to increase their capacity and provide a more reliable effluent qual/ty, as outlined in <br />section 6.2.2. <br /> <br />To fl,nplement this technology at the WPCF, the existing complete-nfix/plug-flow aeration <br />basins would have to be sigrfificantly modified to provide complete ~vgxed anoxic selector <br />zones physically separated from the aerobic zones. This may be accomplished by <br />constructing a new dividing wall along the length of each cell in each bas/n to provide an <br />a_noxic selector having approxLmately 20 percent of the total aeration volume. This would <br />provide four identical cells in each basin containing an anoxic selector followed by an <br />aerobic zone. Primary effluent could then be distributed to each of these cells in various <br />quantifies to accommodate seasonal effluent requirements. Dry weather operations <br />requiring nitrification could distribute primary effluent in the proportion of 25 percent to <br />each cell, whereas wet weather operations where no nitrLficaiton is required could be <br />distributed in the proportion of 33 percent to each of the last three cells in the aeration basin. <br /> <br /> Table 6.2.1-1 summarizes the dry and ,,vet season design criteria used for analysis of the <br /> step-feed anoxic selector process. <br /> <br /> TABLE 6.2.1-1 <br /> Design Cntena: Step-Feed Anoxic Selector Process <br /> MWMC Facifities Plan, Eugene-Springfield <br /> <br /> Parameter Dry Season Wet Season <br /> Temperature, degrees C 15.6 12.5 <br /> Nitnfication Safety Factor 2.0 N/A <br /> Aerobic Volume 80% 80% <br /> Aerobic SRT, days 7.8 4 <br /> Anoxic Volume 20% 20% <br /> Anoxic MCRT, days 1.7 1.0 <br /> PE Flow Split 25% to 4 cells, or 33% to 3 ceils <br /> 33% to 3 cells <br /> SV~, mJ/g 110 120 <br /> <br /> Table 6.2.1-2 sttmmarizes the facility requirements for the modified system to meet the 2025 <br /> projected flow and loads. <br /> <br /> <br />