My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4793
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2004 No. 4782-4819
>
Resolution No. 4793
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:49:14 PM
Creation date
7/7/2004 4:37:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
6/28/2004
Document_Number
4793
CMO_Effective_Date
6/28/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
322
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~W~C FACILI-rlES <br /> <br />from the WPCF to the SIWF. This pipeline conveys Level II plant water. Improvements to <br />the RWM have been made such that 2,400 gpm (1.24 mgd assuming 8 hours per day <br />irrigation) of effluent could be conveyed to the site. <br /> <br />Assuming that grass continues to be grown at the SIWF, the net irrigation requirement is <br />14 inches. This corresponds to reuse of approximately 0.5 mgd in June, 0.9 mgd in July, 0.75 <br />mgd in August, and 0.4 mgd in September, based on applying reuse 8 hours/day. <br /> <br />Advantages: <br /> Because the RWM already extends to the SIWF, effluent can be applied at the site almost <br /> immediately <br /> <br /> Minimal financial investment <br /> <br />, Rural SIWF site meets all Level II reuse requirements <br /> <br /> Minor/nspect/on and retrofitting of the sprinklers on the center pivots at the SIWF <br /> would be required <br /> <br />Disadvantages: <br />* Only provides for 0.9 mgd (maximum) of reuse <br /> <br />This alternative would require the following modifications: rerouting of the RWM piping at <br />the SIWF such that effluent could be applied through the center pivots, and replacement of <br />the sprinklers on the center pivots. <br /> <br />Estimated Cost: $400,000 <br /> <br />Alternative 3 - Level !1 Reuse at the Bioc¥¢le Farm <br />Alternative 3 is to apply- Level II effluent at the BF. The RWM mentioned in Alternative 2 is <br />also routed to the BF pump station located at the BMF. At the BF pump station, effluent is <br />blended with liquid biosolids from the FSLs and then pumped to the BF, where it is applied <br />through hose reels to poplar tree and grass crops. In this alternative a dedicated effluent <br />reuse pipeline would be installed at the BF, parallel to the existing biosolids irrigation <br />pipeline. <br /> <br /> Assuming an available flow rate of 2,400 gpm, a peak application rate of 0.5 inches a day of <br /> effluent could be applied. Assuming 8 hours/day operat/on, approximately 1.5 mgd of <br /> reuse could be applied to the BP. A further evaluation between reuse and biosolids <br /> applicahon already occurring at the site is needed to ensure that the site is maximized for <br /> the biosolids application strategies outlined as part of this Facilities Plan. <br /> <br /> Advantages: <br /> Because the RWM already extends to the BMF, only the effluent irrigation pipeline <br /> would have to be constructed <br /> <br /> * Dilution of biosolids with reuse water increases the biosolids receiving capacity of the <br /> BF, thus providing additional program flexibility in the future <br /> <br /> - Uses the ball potential of the BF as a deal/cared biosolids and reuse site <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.