My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4793
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2004 No. 4782-4819
>
Resolution No. 4793
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:49:14 PM
Creation date
7/7/2004 4:37:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
6/28/2004
Document_Number
4793
CMO_Effective_Date
6/28/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
322
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~MC FACILFrlE$ PLAN <br /> <br /> Disadvantages: <br /> There are few pasteurization treatment systems operating in the U.S. Pre-pasteurization <br /> systems have been installed in Perris, CA; Franklin Township, PA; and Cannel, IA; and* <br /> one is under construction in Alexandria, VA. <br /> <br /> Fouling tendencies in sludge-sludge heat exchangers <br /> <br /> Production of odorous air <br /> <br /> Does not provide additional VSS destnaction or volume reduction <br /> <br /> If heat is not recovered, then energy requirements are bigh <br /> <br />The major components associated with pre-pasteurization include sludge/sludge heat <br />exchangers for pre-heating undigested sludge and for recovering heated digested sludge, <br />hot water heat exchangers for primary sludge heating, pasteurization tank(s) (three small <br />tanks are commonly used to maintain a batch process: fill, hold, and draw pasteurization <br />cycles), mesophilic digester, and recycle and transfer pump. <br /> <br />Site-specific issues associated with the implementation of pre-pasteurization at the WPCF <br />are as follows: <br /> <br /> New pasteurization tank(s) wotdd be needed prior to sludge entering the digester(s). <br /> The tank(s) would need volume for 30 minutes of theoretical SRT. This detention time is <br /> equivalent to 6000 gallons of storage (based on 2025 WWMM flows), or 1500 gallons per <br /> mesophilic digester. Typical pasteurization processes use three pastem4zation tanks (fill, <br /> hold, and draw cycles). <br /> <br /> New hot water heat exchangers will most likely be needed. Undigested sludge must be <br /> heated to 70°C (160°F) prior to entering the pasteurization tank(s). Further evaluation of <br /> the heat exchangers is needed. <br /> <br /> New boilers may be needed to supply the necessary hot water to the exist'Lng heat <br /> exchangers. Further evaluation of the boilers is needed to determine ff they can supply <br /> enough hot water to increase undigested sludge to pasteurization temperatures. <br /> <br /> New sludge/sludge heat exchangers are needed. These will serve as pre-heat treatment <br /> to the hot water heat exchangers and in recovering heat from the heated sludge after the <br /> pasteurization process. <br /> <br /> A fourth mesophilic digester, similar in size to the existing three units, would be <br /> installed. <br /> <br />o The existing digestion system, would remain unchanged. Mesophilic digestion would <br /> still occur. <br /> <br /> New instrumentation and controls (I&C) would be needed for the pasteurization tanks <br /> and heat exchangers. Longer-term, new I&C would be needed with the construction of <br /> the third digester. If the pasteurization process were immediately implemented, it could <br /> be fully automated. Plant staff would be able to monitor and operate the process in one <br /> shift per day. With future facility modifications, the process would remain automated. <br /> <br />5-36 ~WMC_60_REVll DOC <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.