My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4793
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2004 No. 4782-4819
>
Resolution No. 4793
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:49:14 PM
Creation date
7/7/2004 4:37:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
6/28/2004
Document_Number
4793
CMO_Effective_Date
6/28/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
322
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6 DEVELOP)&ENTAND EVALUATION OF ALTERNA'flVES <br /> <br />It would be financially beneficial to investigate adding the SIWF to the WPCF's NPDES <br />permit to decrease annual permit costs. The cost-benefit analysis for this alternative is <br />presented in Table 6.5.5d. <br /> <br />Alternative 2 - Sell the $1WF <br />Alternative 2 is to decommission and sell the la_nd. Advantages and disadvantages of this <br />alternative are lksted below. <br /> <br />Advantages: <br /> Selling the SIWF would avoid the capital costs associated with the/rdrastructure on site <br /> Eliminates annual O&M costs <br /> Would eliminate future site liability <br /> Revenue could hand other costs <br /> <br />Disadvantages: <br /> Lose a potentially valuable asset (land and existing facilities) ~elated to the overall long- <br /> term strategies of IVFNMC's biosolids and effluent reuse program, as well as to potential <br /> regulatory changes. <br /> <br /> To receive the highest possible value for the site, decommissioning efforts will be <br /> required. This is based on selling the land as it is currently zoned (E-30, exclusive farm <br /> use). <br /> <br />, Availability and proximity of land, if required in the future, may be scarce commodities. <br /> <br />· Future cost for development of a site similar to the SIWF will be great. <br /> <br />Alternative 3 - Convert the 14-acre Lagoon at the $1WF into a new Facultative Sludge Lagoon <br />Alternative 3 consists of upgrading the S1WF lagoon to a new FSL. Under this alternative, <br />liquid biosolids could be applied on site. It is also assumed that bmsolids, if applied at the <br />SIWF, would be applied on grass crops at the SIWF and that the existing land 1ease <br />agreement would remain in place. The SIWF lagoon would become the fifth FSL. <br />Advantages and disadvantages of thks alternative are listed below. <br /> <br /> Advantages: <br /> Provides additional sludge stabilization and solids storage, which rnay be needed in the <br /> future <br /> <br /> · Continued leasing of the land for local farming activity ensure that the site is <br /> continuously farmed using sound farm management practices <br /> <br /> · Maintains flexibility in MWMC's biosolids management program <br /> <br /> Disadvantages: <br /> The FSL would be remote from the other four FSLs located at the BMF <br /> <br /> Piping intercormections and primping facilibies would need to be h~stalled between the <br /> SI-WF and BMF <br /> <br /> · Potential for increased complexity of control strategies <br /> <br /> ,~ O&M ks remote from the BMF facilities <br /> <br /> MWt~3_6 O_RE'Vi 1,DOC 6-47 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.