Laserfiche WebLink
6 DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES <br /> <br />- Does not preclude conversion of the existing lagoon for additional FSL space in the <br /> future. <br /> <br />6.6 Development and Eva uation of System Alternatives <br />The Oregon DEQ has mandated el/ruination of SSOs resulting from less than a 5-year, 24- <br />hour rainfall event ha the wet season and a 10-year, 24-hour rainfall event in the dry season <br />[OAR 340-41-0009 (6) and (7)].This nde will take effect by the year 2010. Influent wastewater <br />flows up to these quantifies will be required to be treated to a level so that the effluent meets <br />secondary treatment standards. The projected 2025 PWWF at the WPCF that is being used <br />for planning purposes is 277 mgd. <br /> <br />Collection system modeling efforts and studies have concluded that peak flows could be <br />conveyed by the collection system to the WPCF. Once flows have been conveyed to the <br />WPCF, significant modifications to the facility would be required to treat the PWWF flow. <br /> <br />6.6.1 Common Parameters <br />Several improvements will be constructed/ndependent of the system alternative ultimately <br />implemented, because they serve multiple benefits (e.g., ammonia removal, dry season mass <br />limits, etc.) and/or they will still be required for all peak flow management alternatives. <br />These improvements include enhancements to the existing primary and secondary darifiers, <br />additional secondary clar~iers, new tertiary filters, expansion of the pretreatment facil/ty, <br />primary sludge thickening, a new high-rate disinfection facility, a new effluent blending <br />structure, new thermophilic digesters (or other digestion process to produce Class A <br />biosolids), WAS thickemng facility expansion, odor control facilities, and reuse disinfection <br />with UV. Only System Alternative I will not include implementation of these common <br />improvements. <br /> <br />All system alternal4ves assume the capacity of the existing four primary ctarifiers would be <br />increased to exceed 160 mgd by adding energy dissipating inlets, flocculation feed wells, <br />density current baffles, and by operation without a sludge blanket. All system alternatives <br />also include an increase in secondary treatment capacity to 165 mgd by enhancing <br />secondary clarifiers, modifying the aeration basins to a step feed configuration with anoxic <br />selectors, and by constructing two additional secondary clarifiers. The evaluation was <br />performed assuming that future permits would not include an increase ha allowable TSS <br />and CBODs effluent mass limits. <br /> <br />6.6.2 System Alternatives Development <br />Many alternatives were considered in develop/rig system alternatives. Previou~s sections of <br />Chapter 6 and technical memorandums developed for the Fac/liPy Plan update deta/l <br />alternatives analysis for trait processes in order to treat the projected peak week wet <br />weather flow (PWWWF). The system alternatives proposed in this section focus on the <br />treatment alternatives required to treat the entire PWWF flow to secondary treatment <br />standards. <br /> <br />The proposed system alternatives use a combination of pretreatment, prknary treatment, <br />secondary treatment, and tertiary filtration in conjtmction with high-rate disinfection and <br /> <br />MWMC_§ O_REVI ~.DOC 6-5'J <br /> <br /> <br />