Laserfiche WebLink
6 DEVELOPk~ENT AND EVALUATION OFALTERNATIVE$ <br /> <br /> ~ 30 mgd through Tertiary <br /> Filtration <br /> <br /> mgd through ~ 160 mgd through <br /> Primary Clarification Secondary Treatment <br /> <br /> ~ 140 mgd through "Blending" <br /> Diversion <br /> <br />FIGURE 6.6.2d <br />Process Flow Schematic for System Alternative 3--Additional Primary Clarifiers <br />MWMC Facilities Plan, Eugene.Springfield <br /> <br />System A~ternative 4 - High-Rate Clarification <br />A new high-rate clarification (HRC) trait process would be constructed and used irt <br />conjunction with the existing primary clarifiers to treat the entire 277 mgd PWWF A ptunp <br />station would divert pretreated effluent in excess of 160 mgd from preliminary treatment to <br />the new HRC facility. Primary effluent from the HRC facility would be diverted around the <br />secondary treatment system via gravity. The HRC primary and secondary effluents would <br />be disinfected separately and blended prior to discharge into the river, Figure 6.6,2-2 shows <br />the process flow schematic for system alternative 4. <br /> <br /> ~ 30 mgd through Tertiary <br /> Filtration <br /> <br /> - 160 mgd through <br /> Primary / Secondary <br /> <br /> ~!I ~ ,.,~ ~,~,~,~ ~ 140 mgd through High ' <br /> Rate C~arification <br /> <br />FIGURE 6,6.2-2 <br />Process Flow Schematic for System Alternative 4--HRC <br />MWMC Facilities Plan, Eugene-Spnngfietd <br /> <br />System Alternative 5 - Parallel Primary and Secondary Treatment <br />During peak flow events a dynamic flow management strategy would be used to optimize <br />the existing primary and secondary treatment capacities. Two new pump stations would be <br />used to divert preliminary treated wastewater directly to secondary treatment and divert PE <br />arotmd secondary treatment. Pretreated effluent would flow to the existing primary <br /> <br />MWMC...60_REVI LDO0 6.53 <br /> <br /> <br />