My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution No. 4793
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Resolutions
>
2004 No. 4782-4819
>
Resolution No. 4793
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/10/2010 4:49:14 PM
Creation date
7/7/2004 4:37:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Recorder
CMO_Document_Type
Resolutions
Document_Date
6/28/2004
Document_Number
4793
CMO_Effective_Date
6/28/2004
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
322
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MVVMC FACILITIES PLAN <br /> <br />1,4 Previous Planning Efforts <br /> <br />Prior to 1997, no comprehensive evaluation of the regional wastewater treatment facilities <br />had been performed since/ts startup in 1984. In the mid 1990s MW-MC initiated a study to <br />prepare a Master Plan in order to determine how the treatment processes and facilities were <br />performing relative to the original capacity and performance expectations. The Master Plan <br />(CH2M HILL, 1997) was completed in 1997 and recommended further evaluations to m_ssess <br />the facilities' capacity to treat peak wet weather flows, and to adequately process biosolids. <br />The Biosolids Management Plan (described above) was completed in 1997. In late 1997, <br />lVlWMC initiated a project to develop a comprehensive Wet Weather Flow Management <br />Plan (WWFMP), which was adopted by the MWMC and the two dries in 2001 (CH2M HILL, <br />2001). In 2000 MWMC initiated a project to develop a feasibility study and management <br />plan for a dedicated biosolids land application site. This report was completed kn 2003 <br />(CH2M HILL, 2003). <br /> <br /> 1.4.1 Master Plan <br />The 1997 Master Plan provided an evaluation of the E-S WPCF based on historical flow, <br />loads, and monitoring report data. Other selected facilities of the regional sewerage system <br />were also evaluated. The purpose of the plan was intended to be Pe,,ofold: 1) identify low- <br />cost capital improvements that could be implemented in the short term (3 to 5 years) to <br />improve facility operations, and 2) identify faculty expansion improvements that would <br />need to be implemented over a longer term to meet increasing regional demands for <br />sewerage sen, ice or more stringent regulatory requirements, and to address specLfic priority <br />issues affecting the WPCF. This plan did not include development of a comprehensive <br />hydraulic and treatment process model. However, key evaluations included a limited flow <br />and load analysis, general strategies to manage peak flows, an assessment of <br />infiltration/inflow (I/I) programs, a preliminary peak flow assessment, a disinfection <br />alternatives evaluation, a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) risk management <br />program evaluation, a preliminary biosolids management evaluation that led into the 1997 <br />Biosolids Management Plan, and a plant effluent regulatory assessment. <br /> <br /> 1.4.2 Wet Weather Flow Management Plan <br /> The 2001 WWFMP was developed from reconunendarions in the 1997 Master Plan and <br /> results of preliminary analysis using a hydraulic model developed for the regional <br /> wastewater collection system. Developing the plan consisted of evaluating technologies for <br /> managing excess wet weather flow relative to performance, frequency of sanitary sewer <br /> overflows (SSOs), cost, and political and community acceptance. The overall objective of the <br /> plan was to determine the most cost-effecrive and politically feasible set of solutions for <br /> managing excessive wet weather wastewater flow rates both in the collection system and at <br /> the WPCF. <br /> <br /> The WWFMP was guided by a steering committee of approximately 20 Eugene and <br /> Springfield public works staff, and involved an extensive public involvement process. Staff <br /> from the cities forged a partnership to guide the project and to gather, review, analyze and <br /> interpret data as well as perform hydraulic modeling. A data subconurdttee to the steering <br /> committee performed much of the techrdcal analysis. A Citizens Advisory Committee <br /> (CAC) was charged with reflecting community values and concerns, assisting in evaluating <br /> <br /> 1-4 MWMC_I.O_REVl 3.DOC <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.