Laserfiche WebLink
t INTRODUCllON, PURPOSE AND NEED <br /> <br />facility expand both its base secondary treatment capacity and its pr:anary treatment <br />capacity for the plant to meet its NPDES permit. Regardless, the IViWMC adopted a <br />WWFMP policy that facilities are to be constructed in order to increase the level of full <br />secondary treatment from 103 mgd to 130 mgd. Current effluent blending policy is still <br />evolving; however, blending now provides the most cost-effective approach to treating peak <br />flows. A key underlying assumption in the preparation of this plan is that some level of <br />effluent blending will continue to be an acceptable approach to treating the peak wet <br />weather flows. If the DEQ does not accept this approach in reviewing this plan, contingency <br />solutions that could be implemented are included and evaluated. However, the cost of these <br />facilities would be significantly greater than those recommended in this plan. <br /> <br />1.6.3 Technology Drivers <br />The original treatment facility was constructed in 1984, implementing the appropriate <br />technologies of the era. New technologies have emerged since that time, and will continue <br />to emerge to address both existing and future wastewater treatment needs. New <br />technologies may have the advantage of providing better environmental results, providing <br />more cost-effective treatment, lowering operational and maintenance requirements and <br />costs, and other benefits. Technologies available for implementation today were evaluated <br />as part of the planning process and are recommended where they meet cost-effectiveness, <br />performance, and capacity criteria to meet the future regional wastewater treatment needs <br />for MWMC's service area. <br /> <br />1.6.4 Existing WPGF ssues <br />/% number of at the WPCF evaluated of the <br /> concerns <br /> were <br /> as <br /> part <br /> planning <br /> process <br /> to <br />identify improvements to the existing facilities that would provide operational efficiencies, <br />cost savings, reduced risks/liabilities, and improved worker and neighborhood safety. In <br />some areas, the original capacity of equipment may now be limiting operations (influent <br />pumping capacity is inadequate, screen trough sluice capacity is inadequate, etc.) Other <br />needs are simply a result of aging or outdated equipment (i.e., pumps, valves, gates, <br />communication systems, etc.). Process inefficiencies provide further bottlenecks to efficient <br />operations (grease accumulation in influent screening conveyance, limited modes of <br />operation in aeration basins, high operation and maintenance Lq the existing grit chambers, <br />reduction in struvite scaling, etc.). Finally, the MWMC evaluated the current chlorine <br />disinfection system and the available alternatives, and directed staff to include the <br />conversion to a safer system using sodium hypochlorite. All of these needs must be <br />addressed in order to provide the expansion capability necessary to meet future growth <br />needs and to provide the most cost-effective and safe treatment facility operations. <br /> <br /> 1,7 Project Goa s and Objectives <br /> <br /> The goals of this Facilities Plan are to build on the previous planning efforts that have been <br /> ongoing since 1996 in order to develop a practical and cost-effective set of capital <br /> improvements necessary to meet community needs and minimum environmental standards <br /> for all MWMC facilities for the next 20 years. The Facilities Plan presents comprehensive <br /> and defensz~ble identification and evaluation of available capital improvement strategy <br /> alternatives, and recorrtrnendations that: <br /> <br /> MWMC_1.0_RE¥13 DOC <br /> <br /> <br />