My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Ordinance No. 20437
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Ordinances
>
2009 No. 20426-20449
>
Ordinance No. 20437
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2012 1:36:52 PM
Creation date
10/14/2009 9:30:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Ordinances
CMO_Document_Number
20437
Document_Title
Ordinance on Coordinated Population (Metro Plan Amendment)
Adopted_Date
10/12/2009
Approved Date
10/13/2009
CMO_Effective_Date
11/13/2009
Signer
Kitty Piercy
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
91
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT 5 - <br />B. INTRODUCTION TO THE COUNTY POLICIES COMPONENT OF THE GENERAL <br />PLAN <br />County Policies are broad, somewhat generalized statements that provide direction to <br />County decision makers in their efforts to choose between competing uses for given <br />resources, and in their efforts to solve historic problems and prevent new ones from <br />occurring. The Policies cover complex topics and lay the groundwork for future actions <br />of various kinds. The Policies expressed here apply to Waal Lane County, outside of the <br />Urban Growth Boundaries of cities and beyond the Plan Diagram Boundary of the <br />Eugene- Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan They are designed to be <br />compatible with similar Policies -and planning efforts -of other gov <br />jurisdictions in the County. <br />In some respects, the Policies can be considered the basis of the County plan, in that <br />they provide the lead, or the general direction, for subsequent County actions to deal <br />with various land use and resource management decisions. In doing so, they are <br />directly intended to fulfill the mandate of the LCDC statewide planning Goals. <br />Four statewide planning Goals are not addressed in this document: the four "Coastal <br />Goals" (LCDC Goals 16-19). These, and Policies connected with them, are located in a <br />special- purpose Coastal Resource Management Plan developed and adopted for use in <br />the Coastal portion of the County. They should be used in concert with the "basic <br />fifteen" Goals. Since they are special- purpose in nature, and deal more specifically with <br />particular concerns of the Coastal area, conflicts may arise or be generated between the <br />Coastal Policies and the "basic fifteen" and should be resolved in favor of the Coastal <br />Policies until, and if one or the other conflicting statement is changed to eliminate the <br />conflict <br />The Willamette Greenway Goal is considered to be part of the "basic fifteen ". <br />tti • • t • • •u a • t. <br />The Policies contained in this document were developed during a period of more than <br />a year, beginning in early 1983. A process was devised at the beginning of the period <br />to utilize existing working papers and to prepare a series of new working papers <br />which, along with other sources, were to serve as the technical data based for the <br />Policies. 711e Wprl mg Papers were written and published from mid -1981 to early <br />1984. Each Working Paper contained information on a given topic or topics, and a <br />number of them contained preliminary Policies which were drawn from the <br />information in the Papers and which were presented for initial discussion purposes. <br />Hearings were held on the Papers as they were published. Each Planning Co mmissi on <br />reported to the Board of County Commissioners containing its reaction to the Paper <br />and draft Policies. Often the Policy statements drew on sources other than the <br />Working Papers - existing County Plan information (such as special - purpose plans or <br />technical studies),comments or testimony of individuals or groups appearing at the <br />hearings, the judgment and views of Planning Commission members and w on -and <br />so represented a Inroad array of perspectives and attitudes. Each Planning <br />Pap 3 <br />ATTACHMENT f t� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.