Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 5 <br />On December 2, 2008, the Lane County Planning Commission was invited, and many <br />participated in the PSU Countywide Population Forecast Kick -off meeting held in Harris <br />Hall. Two additional public coordination meetings were -held upon release of the PSU <br />population forecasts, on February 26, 2009 and March 26, 2009. <br />i The PSU effort was also presented in various ways during the LCPC public hearings and <br />consideration of the small city PAPA requesting a coordinated countywide population <br />forecast be adopted into the RCP. The LCPC ultimately recognized the Board would <br />need to decide on the appropriate population forecasts. All of these proceedings gave <br />interested parties and cities'an opportunity to coordinate and paiticipate in development <br />of population forecasts for Lane County and utilized the adopted county citizen <br />involvement program consistent with Goal. I <br />28. Goal 2: Land Use Planning This goal requires establishment of a land use planning <br />process and policy framework to coordinate decisions and actions related to land use <br />and assuring an adequate factual.basis for those decisions. <br />The adoption of a countywide coordinated population forecast for Lane County and <br />urban areas of the county fulfills this goal through the public involvement process <br />under the coordinated policy framework as demonstrated in the public record on file in <br />Land Management The cities and Lane County have coordinated this decision through <br />the data consideration and analysis phase under contract with PSU. The public was <br />provided ample opportunity for input and involvement in the process, as evidenced by <br />over 300 exhibits in the public record for this project. Therefore adopting this <br />amendment is fully consistent with Statewide Planning Goal 2. <br />The Lane County Rural Comprehensive General Plan Policies, Introduction, illustrates <br />the connectedness of the city and county plans, and describes the co- adoption of each <br />city's Comprehensive Plan as illustrated in the introduction. In addition to this visual <br />representation of the relationship between the cities plans and the overall general <br />county plan, Part 1, Section D of the Rural Comprehensive Plan states: <br />"While the Policies in this document are directed at Lane County governmeri; it 1 <br />clearly recognized_ that the County has a responsibility to, and must coordinate efforts <br />closely with, the incorporated cities within its boundaries. Statewide planning law <br />requires that each incorporated city develop and adopt its own land use plan which <br />must itself comply with LCDC Goals. The plan must contain essentially the same <br />elements as the County General Plan, with an additional element of an identified <br />Urban Growth Ba.undary (required by Goal 14). Future urban growth for each city is <br />to take place within that Boundary. In the case of the Eugene - Springfield Metropolitan <br />Area Plan, a mutual Boundary is adopted by both cities and the County. For all other <br />cities, the County must ratify the cities UGBs by independent evaluation of, and <br />adoption of appropriate city plan provisions.. . <br />Through this method, the County.becomes responsible for adminlstering the provisions <br />of city plans within the city UGBs but outside of the corporate city limits. 'Joint <br />Agreements for Planning Coordination' drawn up between the County and each city <br />lay the frameworkfor cooperative action in the effort. " <br />Orditm= No. PA 1255 <br />Eabibit "B" Findings <br />ATTACHMENT x-77 <br />