Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Variations to the Baseline Assumptions ECONorthwest October 2009 Page 15 <br />®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ °´¿² ¼»­·¹²¿¬·±²­ øÌ¿¾´» ßóï÷ô ¿²¼ º«¬«®» »³°´±§³»²¬ ´·µ»´§ ¬± ´±½¿¬» ·² <br />é <br />®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ °´¿² ¼»­·¹²¿¬·±²­ò <br />è <br />Table A-6. Land Needed in Residential Plan Designations, <br /> Eugene UGB, 2010-2030 <br />Land Deficit <br />Plan Designation(Gross Acres) <br />Low Density Residential <br />New Housing 800 <br />Public and Semi-Public Uses 443 <br />Employment in Residential Plan Designations 58 <br />Total Low Density Residential 1,301 <br />Medium Density Residential <br />New Housing 115 <br />Public and Semi-Public Uses 167 <br />Employment in Residential Plan Designations 18 <br />Total Medium Density Residential 300 <br />High Density Residential <br />New Housing 37 <br />Group Quarters 36 <br />Public and Semi-Public Uses167 <br />Employment in Residential Plan Designations 13 <br />Total High Density Residential 254 <br /> Total Residential Land Deficit 1,855 <br /> <br />Source: Comparison of residential capacity with baseline assumptions about needed housing <br />and estimated land demand for non-residential uses in residential plan designations <br />Note: The numbers in the table above may not add exactly to the totals shown in the table <br />as a result of rounding. <br /> <br /> <br /> É» ¼·¼ ¿² ¿²¿´§­·­ ±º °«¾´·½ ¿²¼ ­»³·ó°«¾´·½ «­»­ ©·¬¸·² ¬¸» ËÙÞ ¿²¼ ¿´´±½¿¬»¼ º«¬«®» °«¾´·½ ¿²¼ ­»³·ó°«¾´·½ <br />é <br />´¿²¼ ¼»³¿²¼ øÌ¿¾´» ßóï÷ ¾¿­»¼ ±² ¸·­¬±®·½¿´ ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ °¿¬¬»®²­ò ̸» ¬§°»­ ±º °«¾´·½ ¿²¼ ­»³·ó°«¾´·½ «­»­ ¬¸¿¬ <br />³±­¬ º®»¯«»²¬´§ ´±½¿¬»¼ ·² ®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ °´¿² ¼»­·¹²¿¬·±²­ ©»®» °¿®µ­ô ­½¸±±´­ô ¿²¼ ­»³·ó°«¾´·½ «­»­ ø»ò¹òô ½¸«®½¸»­÷ò <br /> ß¾±«¬ ïëû ±º »³°´±§³»²¬ ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ ·² îððê ©¿­ ´±½¿¬»¼ ·² ®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ °´¿² ¼»­·¹²¿¬·±²­ò É» ¿­­«³»¼ ¬¸¿¬ <br />è <br />ïëû ±º ²»© »³°´±§³»²¬ ©±«´¼ ´±½¿¬» ·² ®»­·¼»²¬·¿´ °´¿² ¼»­·¹²¿¬·±²­ ±ª»® ¬¸» ²»¨¬ î𠧻¿®­ò <br />