My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 1: Ordinances on Infill Compatibility Standards Code Amendments
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 11/16/09 Public Hearing
>
Item 1: Ordinances on Infill Compatibility Standards Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:18:24 PM
Creation date
11/13/2009 9:40:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/16/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
November 6, 2009 <br />Mayor Piercy and City Councilors <br />Re: Building Height Public Hearing (November 9. 2009) <br />As Mayor and City Councilors you have before you the first land use code standards resulting from two <br />years of study and deliberation by the ICS project. The intention of this enormous amount of work <br />was to meet the goal of: <br /> “preventing residential infill that would significantly threaten or diminish the stability, quality, <br /> positive character, livability or natural resources of residential neighborhoods...” <br />To this end the Multi Dwelling committee developed building height standards for the R3 andR4 areas <br />in the South University and West University neighborhoods. Given that this very small, limited section <br />of Eugene is a very desirable and appropriate place for students to live the standards produced by ICS <br />were carefully designed to permit properties in these areas to be built to maximum density allowed by <br />zone criteria, and yet, be as minimal as necessary to meet the permitted densities so as to limit the <br />impact on the surrounding neighborhoods. <br />The standards which were determined to successfully balance these two conflicting goals are as <br />follows: <br />th <br /> 35' height limit for buildings in the R3 and R4 areas south of 19 Ave <br />th <br /> 50' height limit for buildings in the R4 zone for ½ block on the north side of 19 Ave <br />th <br /> 65' height limit for buildings in the R4 zone ½ block south of 18 Ave and to the west of the <br /> University <br />Extensive data is available to you (please see packets provided to you by ICS members and <br />neighborhood residents) which clearly proves that these height standards are not only adequate but <br />more than enough to offer flexibility to any developer looking to build to maximum density. The <br />argument in support of these standards is strengthened all the more by the fact that the data leads to the <br />same conclusion noted by LUBA (see MiCAP appeal). That is, limiting building height in the manner <br />listed above does not in any way preclude achieving maximum density. <br />On the other hand, it should be noted that there is not data whatsoever to support the necessity of <br />heights greater than 65'. Until such time as design standards are mandated by City Council and <br />incorporated into the code there should be no exceptions made for any buildings taller than 65'. <br />One last thought... As we all consider the details of the ICS proposals, it is worrisome to note that no <br />bold <br />one has raised the bigger question. What if the ICS standards aren't enough? What if maximum <br />density is too much? What if the South University neighborhood can't survive the impact of maximum <br />density? What if this vibrant close in neighborhood which has for so long been able to offer residents <br />one of the best options in the City for a “sustainable” lifestyle is swept away in the absence of real <br />planning and a commitment to a livable city? <br />Carolyn Jacobs <br />ICS and Multi Dwelling Committee member <br />Height Implementation Team member <br />Vice Chairperson SUNA <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.