My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 1: Ordinances on Infill Compatibility Standards Code Amendments
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 11/16/09 Public Hearing
>
Item 1: Ordinances on Infill Compatibility Standards Code Amendments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:18:24 PM
Creation date
11/13/2009 9:40:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/16/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
December 6, 2009 <br />Eugene City Councilors and Mayor <br />City of Eugene <br />RE: ICS Parking Recommendations <br />Dear City Councilors: <br />I am testifying in support of adopting the ICS Parking in the University Area proposed code <br />changes. I am strongly in favor of the proposed code changes since they help to protect areas in <br />WUN and SUNA from incompatible infill. The proposed changes allow for modest increases in <br />off-street parking for apartments with larger number of bedrooms. But they also provide other <br />efficient methods, such as tandem parking, for multifamily developments to provide off-street <br />parking. These proposed changes are based on facts, not on fiction or hearsay. <br />First, I would encourage you to consider the proposed land use code amendments on building <br />heights and building height transitions in the context of the citizen-driven process that developed <br />these specific changes. The Infill Compatibility Standards (ICS) Task Team process included <br />input from dozens of neighborhood residents, builders, architects, and other citizens over an 18- <br />month period. The proposed code amendments on building heights received broad public support <br />during the entire ICS process. This support included a unanimous recommendation by the ICS <br />Task Team to adopt these amendments. <br />These proposed code changes were based on detailed information collected as part of the ICS <br />process. This includes information on of-street parking, number of bedrooms, density, and other <br />characteristics of recent multifamily developments in West University Neighborhood (WUN) <br />and South University Neighborhood Association (SUNA). The most noticeable change is that the <br />number of bedrooms per apartment in recent multifamily development has changed dramatically <br />starting in 2004. Previously, most apartments were constructed with 1, or 2 bedrooms, with <br />occasional 3 or 4 bedroom apartments. Now the norm has become 3-5 bedrooms per apartment. <br />I am attaching tables of multifamily developments in WUN and SUNA compared with the <br />changes proposed parking changes. It should be noted that over 80% of the recent multifamily <br />units constructed in WUN would comply with the proposed code amendments. The density of <br />the multifamily projects that complied with the parking proposals was also significantly higher <br />(55 units/acre) than those projects that didn't comply (46 units/acre). Similarly, 91% of the <br />multifamily units constructed in SUNA would also comply with the proposed code amendments. <br />The difference in density in SUNA between the projects that comply (72 units/acre) and the <br />project that would not currently qualify (48 units/acre) is even more dramatic. Furthermore, this <br />data shows examples of multifamily projects in the R-3 and R-4 zones in WUN and SUNA that <br />meet the maximum allowed density of 56 and 112 units/net acre with projects while providing <br />parking in excess of the proposed code changes. <br />These changes are designed to reduce negative impacts of infill on our neighborhoods. In <br />particular, two issues stand out: <br />1.Residents with purchased RPP permits and visitors wasting fuel driving around hunting <br />for parking spaces. <br />Written testimony by Steven Baker on proposed ICS Parking amendments (November 6, 2009) Page 1 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.