My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
CC Minutes - 09/23/09 Process Session
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
2009
>
CC Minutes - 09/23/09 Process Session
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 10:31:33 AM
Creation date
11/17/2009 11:26:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Process Session
CMO_Meeting_Date
9/23/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
past year and she felt the response had been a little slow. <br /> <br />Kristie Hammitt, Executive Director of the Central Services Department, stated that the Municipal Court <br />had worked through a lot of these issues and had some systems in place. She said they had conducted <br />training for the judges that could be beneficial to the councilors. <br /> <br />Mayor Piercy said it would be good to be reminded of basic things such as getting down on the floor if a <br />situation looked threatening. <br /> <br />Mr. Poling remembered that the council used to always take a break during its Monday evening meetings. <br />He did not think it would be unusual to call for a break. <br /> <br />Topic: Consulting with Council before Authorizing a Public Opinion Poll <br /> <br />Mr. Brown stated that they served as City Councilors and as the Urban Renewal Agency and had fiduciary <br />responsibilities associated with this. He felt the council should have been consulted about the survey that the <br />Urban Renewal Agency had authorized. He noted that the survey had cost $25,000. He was not concerned <br />so much about the cost as he was that the council had not been informed. He had learned of it from a co- <br />worker. <br /> <br />Ms. Ortiz disagreed. She said there had been approximately a dozen polls conducted since she had begun <br />her tenure on the City Council. She believed it was an effective way to conduct outreach. She did not want <br />to become involved with the process at that level of detail. She had not seen the executives stray very <br />greatly from the direction they were given. <br /> <br />Mr. Pryor considered this to be about the interface between policy and operations. He believed that <br />conducting a poll was a part of operations and the council was a policy body. He agreed that the council <br />should be informed if the City or the Urban Renewal Agency had an interaction with the public, but he did <br />not want to be involved in the design of it. <br /> <br />Mr. Clark agreed with Mr. Pryor. He would want to know about a poll before it was administered. He <br />recalled that he had learned from the local newspaper about one. He added his observation that sometimes <br />subtleties drove questions in a survey. He believed it was important to clearly understand what outcome <br />was desired before engaging in this type of outreach. <br /> <br />Mr. Zelenka thought it was good to conduct polls. He was not in favor of requiring the council to approve <br />of surveys, but he wanted to be able to discuss the policy. <br /> <br />Mr. Brown did not want to micromanage the process. He believed that there had been policy implications in <br />the Urban Renewal Agency poll and that policy implications should require council discussion. He thought <br />the questions might have been a little different had a couple of the councilors participated in it. <br /> <br />Ms. Taylor agreed that the council should be aware of such a survey before it happened. She expressed <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—City Council September 23, 2009 Page 6 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.