My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Item 2C: Adoption of Resolution Amending MWMC Regional Wastewater SDC Methodology
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Agendas 2009
>
CC Agenda - 11/23/09 Meeting
>
Item 2C: Adoption of Resolution Amending MWMC Regional Wastewater SDC Methodology
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2010 12:32:03 PM
Creation date
11/20/2009 10:33:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
City_Council_Document_Type
Agenda Item Summary
CMO_Meeting_Date
11/23/2009
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
credit shall accrue from the year of annexation, and be based upon the assessed value of the <br />real property at the time of application for connection to the system. <br />Appendix E shows the calculation of the GO bond credit. <br />Future Payments <br />At the time of adoption of the project list upon which SDCs are to be based, or any periodic <br />modification to such list, a credit against the SDCs will be calculated. The credit will reflect <br />the present value of future contributions (through user fees) by new development to the <br />repayment of debt service for the cost of capital improvements that benefit existing <br />customers.. The credit analysis is structured as follows: <br />1.Debt services costs attributable to projects on the SDC project list are allocated between <br /> <br />growth and existing users, based on the projects funded with the debt proceeds. <br />2.Future user fee billing units (average flow and pounds of BOD and TSS) are estimated <br /> <br />for each year of the planning period based on system planning criteria <br />3.The annual user rate supported debt service per billing unit is determined by dividing <br /> <br />the existing users’ share of debt service payable each year from user fees (from Step 1) <br />by the annual billing units estimated for each year (from Step 2), over the life of the debt. <br />4.The present value of the future stream of rate payments is determined for each year of <br /> <br />the planning period to determine the credit amount per unit of capacity. <br />Methodology Element Five: Periodic modification of existing sytem and future <br />project values <br />The value of existing available capacity and future available capacity may be adjusted from <br />time to time as stated in Methodology Element Two: Step One and Step Three. <br />Methodology Element Six: Compliance Charge <br />A charge is included for the costs of complying with the provisions of ORS 223.297 to <br />223.314, including: <br />? <br />Legal costs (both litigation costs and annual routine legal fees) <br /> <br />? <br />Annual Accounting/auditing costs <br /> <br />? <br />Annual reporting costs <br /> <br />? <br />SDC methodology development costs <br /> <br />In developing the compliance charge, the total costs associated with SDC compliance <br />activities are projected for the planning period. The costs are then attributed to the capacity <br />parameters in proportion to the combined reimbursement and improvement costs. As with <br />the improvement and reimbursement fees, the costs by parameter are then divided by the <br />number of growth units projected for the planning period in order to determine a <br />compliance cost per unit of capacity. <br />Page 19 OF 39 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.