Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Zelenka noted he would feel more comfortable supporting Mr. Brown's motion if it had described precisely <br />who would perform an ECLA review as well how such a review would be conducted, when it would be <br />completed, and how much it would cost the City. He noted that without such information he was inclined to agree <br />with Mr. Dedrick's estimation of current ECLA peer review strategies. <br />Ms. Piercy added it seemed necessary to consider the staff responses to the various concerns of the CAC before <br />considering if additional peer review strategies were called for. <br />Mr. Brown agreed that Mr. Dedrick, Mr. Zelenka and Ms. Piercy's comments were valid and admitted he would <br />need to bring more detailed information regarding additional peer review strategies to the council. <br />Mr. Brown, with the consent of the second, withdrew his previously stated motion. <br />Ms. Taylor wanted to hear input from any dissenting members of the CAC who might have disagreed with the <br />majority opinions and recommendations of that group. <br />Mr. Clark wanted more detailed information on how the recent adoption of the Stormwater Manual into the City <br />Code would affect how drainage ways and similar lands were designated within the ECLA process. He further <br />requested similar detailed information regarding lands that currently had no definitive Metro Plan designation. <br />Mr. Dedrick responded that the Metro Plan designations were not tax lot specific in certain instances where a <br />boundary was located between tax lots and further commented that, if all lots with an indeterminate land <br />designation were removed from the assessment, approximately one-third of all land within the UGB would be <br />removed. <br />Mr. Dedrick noted that the determination of Metro Plan designations for tax lots within the UGB was not within <br />the realm of the ECLA process. Mr. Clark responded that he looked forward to more information regarding the <br />matter. <br />C. WORK SESSION: <br /> Street Assessment Policy <br /> <br />Ms. Piercy noted that, in the interest of time, the Street Assessment Policy discussion listed on the council's work <br />session agenda would be postponed to a later work session and apologized to those staff members who were <br />present to discuss that topic. <br />Ms. Piercy noted that the ECLA process was an extremely serious matter for the community and that further <br />meetings might be necessary to adequately address the matter. <br />Ms. Piercy adjourned the meeting at 7:15 p.m. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Jon Ruiz <br />City Manager <br /> <br />(Recorded by Wade Hicks) <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council September 28, 2009 Page 12 <br /> Work Session <br />